Lenovo 90AV001NFR

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 38%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 30%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics51.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive37.2% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemLenovo 90AV001NFR  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO
Memory12.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150306
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 07 '21 at 00:56
Run Duration129 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 11%

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4460-$194
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
66.5% Good
Memory 79
1-Core 96
2-Core 174
68% 116 Pts
4-Core 313
8-Core 317
42% 315 Pts
64-Core 354
22% 354 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 66.5%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
CLim: 1455 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 496.49
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
51.7% Above average
Lighting 64.1
Reflection 70
Parallax 62.6
52% 65.6 fps
MRender 68.9
Gravity 64.2
Splatting 55.2
51% 62.8 fps
Poor: 43%
This bench: 51.7%
Great: 54%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V300 240GB-$35
56GB free (System drive)
Firmware: BBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 106 108 104 106 105 108 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
37.2% Below average
Read 116
Write 157
Mixed 112
SusWrite 106
28% 123 MB/s
4K Read 21
4K Write 25.1
4K Mixed 18.8
69% 21.6 MB/s
DQ Read 79.8
DQ Write 135
DQ Mixed 108
82% 108 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 37.2%
Great: 85%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$29
493GB free
Firmware: 1A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 133 137 149 152 151 151 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
81.9% Excellent
Read 140
Write 143
Mixed 102
SusWrite 146
98% 132 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 1.1
213% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 81.9%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B5173DB0-CK0 Micron 8JTF51264AZ-1G6E1 M378B5173EB0-CK0 M378B5173EB0-CK0 16GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
58% Above average
MC Read 21
MC Write 22.7
MC Mixed 17.8
59% 20.5 GB/s
SC Read 14.9
SC Write 18.2
SC Mixed 18.4
49% 17.2 GB/s
Latency 82.5
48% 82.5 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 90AV001NFR Builds (Compare 15 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft

System: Lenovo 90AV001NFR

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 60% - Above average Total price: $429
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback