MSI Z370 GODLIKE GAMING (MS-7A98)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 154%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 98%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 140%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 98%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics158% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive139% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7A98
MotherboardMSI Z370 GODLIKE GAMING (MS-7A98)  (all builds)
Memory10.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display3840 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200604
Uptime5 Days
Run DateNov 06 '21 at 15:08
Run Duration365 Seconds
Run User BEL-User
Background CPU9%
Watch Gameplay: 2080-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8700K-$175
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
98% Outstanding
Memory 97.7
1-Core 131
2-Core 269
93% 166 Pts
4-Core 528
8-Core 850
85% 689 Pts
64-Core 1,067
66% 1,067 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 98%
Great: 100%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-Ti-$441
MSI(1462 3710) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2205 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 496.49
Performing below potential (56th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
158% Outstanding
Lighting 213
Reflection 205
Parallax 254
173% 224 fps
MRender 261
Gravity 217
Splatting 161
169% 213 fps
Poor: 128%
This bench: 158%
Great: 174%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston KC1000 NVMe PCIe M.2 960GB-$773
489GB free (System drive)
Firmware: E7FT04.9 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 830 637 851 677 769 752 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
139% Outstanding
Read 820
Write 1,039
Mixed 503
SusWrite 753
176% 779 MB/s
4K Read 30.6
4K Write 75.6
4K Mixed 39.2
137% 48.5 MB/s
DQ Read 354
DQ Write 454
DQ Mixed 480
341% 429 MB/s
Poor: 109%
This bench: 139%
Great: 221%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$140
591GB free
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 365 411 397 419 411 412 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
118% Outstanding
Read 507
Write 483
Mixed 454
SusWrite 402
104% 462 MB/s
4K Read 41.6
4K Write 90
4K Mixed 55.1
181% 62.2 MB/s
DQ Read 383
DQ Write 343
DQ Mixed 359
270% 362 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 118%
Great: 133%
Samsung 870 QVO 4TB-$280
318GB free
Firmware: SVQ02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 365 310 166 164 162 162 MB/s
Performing below expectations (40th percentile)
103% Outstanding
Read 494
Write 482
Mixed 396
SusWrite 221
89% 398 MB/s
4K Read 38.6
4K Write 89
4K Mixed 52.2
172% 59.9 MB/s
DQ Read 381
DQ Write 342
DQ Mixed 357
269% 360 MB/s
Poor: 70%
This bench: 103%
Great: 128%
WDC WD60EZAZ-00SF3B0 6TB
41GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 153 155 155 154 154 157 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
35% Below average
Read 181
Write 151
Mixed 91.4
SusWrite 155
32% 145 MB/s
4K Read 39.6
4K Write 12.3
4K Mixed 1
68% 17.6 MB/s
DQ Read 1.2
DQ Write 10.6
DQ Mixed 1.1
2% 4.3 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 35%
Great: 39%
WD Black 6TB (2016)-$222
2GB free
Firmware: 81.H0A81
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 39.2
Write 57.5
Mixed 35.4
33% 44 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 3.1
4K Mixed 0.5
138% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 64% Great: 121%
WD WD6003FZBX-00K5WB0 6TB
2.5TB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 193 194 195 192 195 194 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
109% Outstanding
Read 186
Write 197
Mixed 88.9
SusWrite 194
121% 166 MB/s
4K Read 1.5
4K Write 5.1
4K Mixed 1.9
368% 2.83 MB/s
Poor: 78%
This bench: 109%
Great: 138%
Seagate ST10000NE0008-2JM101 10TB
4.5TB free
Firmware: EN02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 236 235 240 239 228 240 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 10% Great: 112%
WDC WD60 EZAZ-00SF3B0 6TB
177GB free, PID 0715
SusWrite @10s intervals: 78 78 77 78 78 78 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
88.1% Excellent
Read 191
Write 161
Mixed 105
SusWrite 77.7
170% 134 MB/s
4K Read 30.4
4K Write 11.8
4K Mixed 1
548% 14.4 MB/s
DQ Read 0.6
DQ Write 10.8
DQ Mixed 0.9
400% 4.1 MB/s
WDC WD60 EZAZ-00SF3B0 6TB
62GB free, PID 0715
SusWrite @10s intervals: 163 162 161 162 162 162 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
107% Outstanding
Read 205
Write 168
Mixed 94.8
SusWrite 162
205% 157 MB/s
4K Read 27.6
4K Write 11.6
4K Mixed 1
531% 13.4 MB/s
DQ Read 0.5
DQ Write 10.5
DQ Mixed 1
393% 4 MB/s
WDC WD60 EZRZ-00GZ5B1 6TB
102GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 113 118 113 115 116 117 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
46.1% Average
Read 92.7
Write 89.2
Mixed 76.2
SusWrite 115
128% 93.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 0.9
116% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 46.1%
Great: 66%
WDC WD60 EZAZ-00SF3B0 6TB
115GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 168 169 169 170 168 169 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
108% Outstanding
Read 188
Write 160
Mixed 101
SusWrite 169
204% 154 MB/s
4K Read 27.4
4K Write 12.1
4K Mixed 1
547% 13.5 MB/s
DQ Read 0.6
DQ Write 10.8
DQ Mixed 0.5
387% 3.97 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 108%
Great: 105%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3200 C14 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
101% Outstanding
MC Read 39.5
MC Write 38.4
MC Mixed 28.3
101% 35.4 GB/s
SC Read 21.3
SC Write 40
SC Mixed 32.1
89% 31.1 GB/s
Latency 47.3
84% 47.3 ns
Poor: 61%
This bench: 101%
Great: 122%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z370 GODLIKE GAMING (MS-7A98) Builds (Compare 137 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 112%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 102%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI Z370 GODLIKE GAMING (MS-7A98)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 75% - Very good Total price: $912
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback