ECS B75H2-M3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 40%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics46.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive48.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardECS B75H2-M3  (all builds)
Memory3.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130103
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateNov 06 '21 at 08:45
Run Duration143 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3570
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
77.3% Very good
Memory 87.6
1-Core 101
2-Core 202
75% 130 Pts
4-Core 389
8-Core 379
52% 384 Pts
64-Core 376
23% 376 Pts
Poor: 50%
This bench: 77.3%
Great: 75%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
CLim: 1455 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 496.49
Performing below potential (37th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
46.6% Average
Lighting 56.3
Reflection 69.3
Parallax 59.5
46% 61.7 fps
MRender 68.3
Gravity 57.4
Splatting 53.4
48% 59.7 fps
Poor: 43%
This bench: 46.6%
Great: 54%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Midasforce 240GB 240GB
163GB free (System drive)
Firmware: T1130A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 78 90 94 95 94 95 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
48.7% Average
Read 354
Write 319
Mixed 290
SusWrite 90.9
59% 263 MB/s
4K Read 22.6
4K Write 57.2
4K Mixed 17.8
87% 32.5 MB/s
DQ Read 27.7
DQ Write 106
DQ Mixed 19.6
29% 51.1 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 48.7%
Great: 91%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$20
137GB free
Firmware: KC48
SusWrite @10s intervals: 85 94 94 95 94 95 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
53% Above average
Read 91.8
Write 91.5
Mixed 48.4
SusWrite 93.1
60% 81.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.6
114% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 53%
Great: 88%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT451U6MFR8C-PB 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
58.9% Above average
MC Read 21.6
MC Write 22.1
MC Mixed 18.1
59% 20.6 GB/s
SC Read 16.3
SC Write 17.7
SC Mixed 17.6
49% 17.2 GB/s
Latency 69.9
57% 69.9 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 58.9%
Great: 59%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical B75H2-M3 Builds (Compare 47 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: ECS B75H2-M3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $87
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback