Lenovo 4158D9U

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 35%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 33%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics51.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory40GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 40GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemLenovo 4158D9U  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO LENOVO
Memory36 GB free of 40 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1824 x 1026 - 32 Bit colores,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140114
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 06 '21 at 03:04
Run Duration309 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon X5670
1366-pin LGA, 2 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 2.95 GHz, turbo 3.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
72.6% Very good
Memory 85.5
1-Core 83.7
2-Core 162
66% 111 Pts
4-Core 322
8-Core 498
51% 410 Pts
64-Core 1,098
68% 1,098 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 72.6%
Great: 75%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
CLim: 1455 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 496.13
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
51.9% Above average
Lighting 64.3
Reflection 69.6
Parallax 62.7
52% 65.5 fps
MRender 69.1
Gravity 63.9
Splatting 56.2
51% 63.1 fps
Poor: 43%
This bench: 51.9%
Great: 54%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$32
238GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 94 99 101 99 102 102 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
75.1% Very good
Read 162
Write 157
Mixed 83.2
SusWrite 99.5
92% 125 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1.2
224% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 75.1%
Great: 109%
Seagate ST750LM022 HN-M750MBB 750GB
106GB free
Firmware: 2BA30001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 73 75 74 75 75 53 MB/s
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
45.2% Average
Read 86.7
Write 74.1
Mixed 42.5
SusWrite 70.8
50% 68.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.8
138% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 45.2%
Great: 57%
Seagate ST500LM012 HN-M500MBB 500GB
120GB free
Firmware: 2BA30001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 53 55 59 60 45 43 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
33.8% Below average
Read 64.9
Write 31.8
Mixed 37.2
SusWrite 52.6
34% 46.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.9
150% 1 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 33.8%
Great: 59%
HP v100w 2GB
2GB free, PID 3207
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.4 3.5 3.3 3.4 3.6 3.6 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
2.61% Terrible
Read 7.2
Write 3.5
Mixed 1.7
SusWrite 3.3
5% 3.92 MB/s
4K Read 3.6
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
13% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 2.61%
Great: 7%
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 4GB
0GB free, PID 5567
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 18.2
Write 5.2
Mixed 5.7
10% 9.7 MB/s
4K Read 4.7
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
17% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 5% Great: 12%
Generic Flash Disk 4GB
1GB free, PID 6387
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.8 8.1 8.1 8 8 6.6 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
4.09% Terrible
Read 13.2
Write 6.7
Mixed 5
SusWrite 7.7
10% 8.15 MB/s
4K Read 2.1
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
8% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 2%
This bench: 4.09%
Great: 7%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown HP655410-150-HYCG 00DA HMT351U6EFR8C-PB 1089 99U5471-054.A00LF 1089 HP655410-150-HYCG 30B0 NT4GC64B8HG0NF-DI 00DA HMT351U6EFR8C-PB 1089 99U5471-054.A00LF 00DA HMT351U6BFR8C-H9 40GB
1066, 1066, 1066, 1066, 1066, 1066, 1066, 1066 MHz
4096, 4096, 8192, 4096, 4096, 4096, 8192, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
19.7% Very poor
MC Read 6.3
MC Write 5.5
MC Mixed 4.7
16% 5.5 GB/s
SC Read 7.1
SC Write 5.1
SC Mixed 7.1
18% 6.43 GB/s
Latency 71.6
56% 71.6 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 4158D9U Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete

System: Lenovo 4158D9U

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 58% - Above average Total price: $200
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback