Today's hottest deals

Asus M5A97 LE R2.0

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 32%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 24%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics52.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (23%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus M5A97 LE R2.0  (all builds)
Memory24.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160324
Uptime16 Days
Run DateNov 05 '21 at 05:40
Run Duration135 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 23%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-6300-$90
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 3 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
61.4% Good
Memory 86.1
1-Core 64.3
2-Core 119
57% 89.8 Pts
4-Core 205
8-Core 261
30% 233 Pts
64-Core 255
16% 255 Pts
Poor: 44%
This bench: 61.4%
Great: 62%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
CLim: 2138 MHz, MLim: 2081 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 496.49
Performing below potential (14th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
52.2% Above average
Lighting 71.3
Reflection 76.1
Parallax 69.7
58% 72.4 fps
MRender 68.4
Gravity 2.7
Splatting 71.4
41% 47.5 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 52.2%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Black 1TB (2010)-$60
157GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 05.01D05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 58 60 49 37 45 38 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
43.3% Average
Read 102
Write 90.2
Mixed 53.9
SusWrite 47.8
54% 73.6 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1
207% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 43.3%
Great: 76%
WD Red 3TB (2012)-$80
1TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 123 123 123 124 124 126 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
71.5% Very good
Read 125
Write 124
Mixed 72.6
SusWrite 124
82% 111 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 0.8
172% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 71.5%
Great: 88%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$22
185GB free
Firmware: 19.01H19
SusWrite @10s intervals: 59 60 54 52 52 51 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
48.9% Average
Read 116
Write 100
Mixed 70.5
SusWrite 54.5
63% 85.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.9
156% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 48.9%
Great: 69%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CL11-11-11 D3-2133 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 800 MHz
Performing below potential (19th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
47.5% Average
MC Read 20.1
MC Write 13.5
MC Mixed 17.5
49% 17 GB/s
SC Read 10.2
SC Write 7.9
SC Mixed 12.8
29% 10.3 GB/s
Latency 71.2
56% 71.2 ns
Poor: 45%
This bench: 47.5%
Great: 73%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M5A97 LE R2.0 Builds (Compare 1,490 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus M5A97 LE R2.0 - $200

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 82% - Excellent Total price: $374
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $85
Intel Core i5-13600K $200Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback