Default string

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 33%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (11th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 89 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 49.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics64.4% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (46%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemDefault string  (all builds)
MotherboardRayvision R20
Memory13 GB free of 16 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit 种颜色
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200603
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 05 '21 at 03:58
Run Duration297 Seconds
Run User CHN-User
Background CPU 46%
Watch Gameplay: 1660S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core (Haswell, no TSX, IBRS)
CPU 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
49.1% Average
Memory 52.8
1-Core 56.5
2-Core 109
43% 72.8 Pts
4-Core 244
8-Core 450
42% 347 Pts
64-Core 436
27% 436 Pts
Poor: 37%
This bench: 49.1%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super)-$195
Device(107D 21C4) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 471.11
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
64.4% Good
Lighting 79.8
Reflection 76.1
Parallax 73.3
65% 76.4 fps
MRender 95.9
Gravity 75
Splatting 66.1
63% 79 fps
Poor: 65%
This bench: 64.4%
Great: 76%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Red Hat VirtIO 10TB
47GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 51 49 50 45 47 45 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
31.7% Below average
Read 303
Write 194
Mixed 241
SusWrite 47.9
44% 197 MB/s
4K Read 8.2
4K Write 12.2
4K Mixed 9.9
32% 10.1 MB/s
DQ Read 228
DQ Write 74.7
DQ Mixed 48.5
63% 117 MB/s
Red Hat VirtIO 54GB
15GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 36 11 24 28 52 51 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 14% Great: 106%
Red Hat VirtIO 107GB
93GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 91 64 98 56 51 83 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 11% Great: 82%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
QEMU 1x16GB
1 of 1 slots used
16GB DIMM RAM
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
31.5% Below average
MC Read 12.4
MC Write 10.7
MC Mixed 10.5
32% 11.2 GB/s
SC Read 8
SC Write 9.5
SC Mixed 9.2
25% 8.9 GB/s
Latency 151
26% 151 ns
Poor: 38%
This bench: 31.5%
Great: 161%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical string Builds (Compare 14,707 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard

System: Default string

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $87
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback