Default string

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 30%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (12th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 88 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 53.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics61.2% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemDefault string  (all builds)
MotherboardRayvision R20
Memory13.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit 种颜色
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200603
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 17 '21 at 21:01
Run Duration240 Seconds
Run User CHN-User
Background CPU9%
Watch Gameplay: 1660S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core (Haswell, no TSX, IBRS)
CPU 0, 1 CPU, 5 cores, 10 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
53.4% Above average
Memory 55.9
1-Core 67.9
2-Core 137
50% 86.8 Pts
4-Core 273
8-Core 450
44% 362 Pts
64-Core 510
32% 510 Pts
Poor: 37%
This bench: 53.4%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super)-$195
Device(107D 21C4) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 471.11
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
61.2% Good
Lighting 76.1
Reflection 80.1
Parallax 77.8
62% 78 fps
MRender 89.3
Gravity 70.1
Splatting 64
60% 74.5 fps
Poor: 65%
This bench: 61.2%
Great: 76%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Red Hat VirtIO 9.5TB
35GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 54 55 57 52 54 51 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
28% Poor
Read 320
Write 168
Mixed 263
SusWrite 53.7
45% 202 MB/s
4K Read 7.6
4K Write 11
4K Mixed 8
28% 8.87 MB/s
DQ Read 96.4
DQ Write 54.3
DQ Mixed 31.8
35% 60.8 MB/s
Red Hat VirtIO 54GB
16GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 16 14 39 10 52 18 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 14% Great: 106%
Red Hat VirtIO 107GB
93GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 104 88 78 90 53 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 11% Great: 82%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
QEMU 1x16GB
1 of 1 slots used
16GB DIMM RAM
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
31.8% Below average
MC Read 12.2
MC Write 10.9
MC Mixed 10.3
32% 11.1 GB/s
SC Read 8.6
SC Write 10.3
SC Mixed 10
28% 9.63 GB/s
Latency 140
28% 140 ns
Poor: 38%
This bench: 31.8%
Great: 161%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 12 10 60 21.7" 1280 720 AOC0CCD 28E850
Typical string Builds (Compare 14,707 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard

System: Default string

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $87
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback