HP HPE-350fr

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics25.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (30%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP HPE-350fr  (all builds)
MotherboardMSI 2A9C
Memory11 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1824 x 1026 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100712
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 04 '21 at 23:40
Run Duration189 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 30%

 PC Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7 860-$320
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
59.2% Above average
Memory 84.4
1-Core 75.6
2-Core 128
60% 96.1 Pts
4-Core 186
8-Core 273
29% 230 Pts
64-Core 265
16% 265 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 59.2%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-$101
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 472.12
Performing below potential (73rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
25.5% Poor
Lighting 32
Reflection 34
Parallax 31.7
26% 32.6 fps
MRender 36.7
Gravity 33.1
Splatting 22.8
24% 30.9 fps
Poor: 24%
This bench: 25.5%
Great: 28%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$28
38GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 03.01A03
SusWrite @10s intervals: 49 86 95 98 93 106 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
55.3% Above average
Read 104
Write 96
Mixed 66.7
SusWrite 87.9
65% 88.8 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.3
120% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 55.3%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 99U5584-005.A00LF 98012C80 9905584-032.A00LF 9801 99U5584-005.A00LF 9801 99U5584-005.A00LF 16GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
37.1% Below average
MC Read 13.8
MC Write 12.2
MC Mixed 12
36% 12.7 GB/s
SC Read 8.5
SC Write 10.1
SC Mixed 9.7
27% 9.43 GB/s
Latency 72.8
55% 72.8 ns
Poor: 37%
This bench: 37.1%
Great: 40%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical HPE-350fr Builds (Compare 7 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

System: HP HPE-350fr

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 55% - Above average Total price: $513
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback