Megaport MS-7C75

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 161%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 105%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 177%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 104%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics157% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive251% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemMegaport MS-7C75  (all builds)
MotherboardMicro-Star MPG Z490 GAMING PLUS (MS-7C75)
Memory24.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201013
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateNov 03 '21 at 17:24
Run Duration197 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 3070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-10900K-$430
U3E1, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 5.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
104% Outstanding
Memory 87.1
1-Core 167
2-Core 330
104% 195 Pts
4-Core 652
8-Core 1,204
111% 928 Pts
64-Core 2138
132% 2138 Pts
Poor: 89%
This bench: 104%
Great: 106%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3070-$500
CLim: 2160 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 496.13
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
157% Outstanding
Lighting 231
Reflection 220
Parallax 212
189% 221 fps
MRender 204
Gravity 164
Splatting 143
136% 170 fps
Poor: 135%
This bench: 157%
Great: 158%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial P2 3D NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$99
785GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P2CR Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1687 1708 1713 1729 1714 1719 MB/s
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
251% Outstanding
Read 1,078
Write 1,603
Mixed 1,246
SusWrite 1,712
320% 1,410 MB/s
4K Read 47.5
4K Write 135
4K Mixed 66.8
229% 83.2 MB/s
DQ Read 710
DQ Write 754
DQ Mixed 855
609% 773 MB/s
Poor: 84%
This bench: 251%
Great: 299%
WD Green 3TB (2011)-$59
572GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 75 76 77 78 78 77 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
57.9% Above average
Read 125
Write 97.8
Mixed 91.3
SusWrite 76.8
72% 97.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1
187% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 57.9%
Great: 83%
WD Blue 3TB (2015)-$90
951GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 117 122 123 122 125 128 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
65.4% Good
Read 105
Write 102
Mixed 75
SusWrite 123
74% 101 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.8
156% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 65.4%
Great: 96%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing below potential (29th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
77.8% Very good
MC Read 30.2
MC Write 30.6
MC Mixed 20.9
78% 27.2 GB/s
SC Read 17.8
SC Write 34.8
SC Mixed 24
73% 25.5 GB/s
Latency 70.3
57% 70.3 ns
Poor: 63%
This bench: 77.8%
Great: 114%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MS-7C75 Builds (Compare 64 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 147%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 158%
UFO

System: Megaport MS-7C75

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 79% - Very good Total price: $1,018
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback