Lenovo 82ME

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (79th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 21 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics17.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive118% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemLenovo 82ME  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO LNVNB161216
Memory4.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210113
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 03 '21 at 16:52
Run Duration138 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing above expectations (79th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-1135G7
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
83.4% Excellent
Memory 72.8
1-Core 154
2-Core 314
95% 180 Pts
4-Core 511
8-Core 694
76% 602 Pts
64-Core 694
43% 694 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 83.4%
Great: 77%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Xe
Legend(17AA 3F9C) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8853
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
17.6% Very poor
Lighting 22.8
Reflection 23.9
Parallax 25.1
19% 23.9 fps
MRender 13.5
Gravity 27.4
Splatting 17.3
16% 19.4 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 17.6%
Great: 20%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme SSSTC CL1-4D256 256GB
198GB free (System drive)
Firmware: BS262 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 246 217 297 311 207 213 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
118% Outstanding
Read 1,384
Write 471
Mixed 397
SusWrite 248
136% 625 MB/s
4K Read 30.2
4K Write 31.3
4K Mixed 22.3
91% 27.9 MB/s
DQ Read 685
DQ Write 202
DQ Mixed 233
226% 373 MB/s
Poor: 70%
This bench: 118%
Great: 156%
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 16GB
9GB free, PID 5567
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.1 3.5 4.6 3.6 4.5 4.3 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
11.1% Very poor
Read 33.2
Write 5.2
Mixed 7.4
SusWrite 4.1
12% 12.5 MB/s
4K Read 3.4
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 1
98% 1.97 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 11.1%
Great: 17%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 4ATF1G64HZ-3G2E1 1x8GB
1 of 1 slots used
8GB Row of chips DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
42.8% Average
MC Read 15.2
MC Write 16.6
MC Mixed 11.3
41% 14.4 GB/s
SC Read 15.2
SC Write 17.1
SC Mixed 13.7
44% 15.3 GB/s
Latency 95
42% 95 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 42.8%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 82ME Builds (Compare 45 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 82ME

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback