HP 800 G2

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics15.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive34% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP 800 G2  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8053
Memory9.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191225
Uptime12.3 Days
Run DateNov 03 '21 at 13:44
Run Duration166 Seconds
Run User ISR-User
Background CPU 22%

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700-$170
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
79.7% Very good
Memory 84
1-Core 121
2-Core 234
82% 146 Pts
4-Core 407
8-Core 622
64% 514 Pts
64-Core 613
38% 613 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 79.7%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 550-$79
Sapphire(1DA2 E367) 2GB
CLim: 1071 MHz, MLim: 1500 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 21.7.1
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
15.3% Very poor
Lighting 17.8
Reflection 25.4
Parallax 23.5
14% 22.2 fps
MRender 24.1
Gravity 17.7
Splatting 20
17% 20.6 fps
Poor: 12%
This bench: 15.3%
Great: 16%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
APS-SL3N-240 240GB
81GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S0423B0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 197 5.3 41 2.5 5.5 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
34% Below average
Read 445
Write 296
Mixed 10.2
SusWrite 44.2
43% 199 MB/s
4K Read 30.8
4K Write 6.8
4K Mixed 0.4
51% 12.7 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 34%
Great: 92%
Sandisk PLUS 480GB
230GB free
Firmware: UG4004RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 321 234 209 217 246 256 MB/s
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
52.6% Above average
Read 400
Write 333
Mixed 287
SusWrite 247
71% 317 MB/s
4K Read 18.4
4K Write 38.3
4K Mixed 7.9
58% 21.5 MB/s
DQ Read 116
DQ Write 99
DQ Mixed 35.7
46% 83.7 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 52.6%
Great: 61%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA851U6AFR6N-UH Micron 4ATF51264AZ-2G3B1 HMA851U6AFR6N-UH Micron 4ATF51264AZ-2G3B1 16GB
2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (21st percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
68.2% Good
MC Read 24.8
MC Write 26
MC Mixed 21.1
68% 24 GB/s
SC Read 15.4
SC Write 27
SC Mixed 21.6
61% 21.3 GB/s
Latency 73.5
54% 73.5 ns
Poor: 55%
This bench: 68.2%
Great: 79%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 800 G2 Builds (Compare 2 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard

System: HP 800 G2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 75% - Very good Total price: $324
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes the youtubers that are paid to promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback