PC Status | Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (18th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 82 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
Graphics | 45.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 75.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times. |
Memory | 32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Asus PRIME B350-PLUS (all builds) |
Memory | 17 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.8 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20200714 |
Uptime | 0.1 Days |
Run Date | Nov 03 '21 at 10:50 |
Run Duration | 238 Seconds |
Run User | DEU-User |
Background CPU | 69% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
57.9%
Above average
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super)-$210
Nvidia(10DE 1E84) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 461.40
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
45.6%
Average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 840 Evo 500GB-$150
109GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0DB6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 339 280 235 187 225 213 MB/s
|
75.8%
Very good
|
|||
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$140
41GB free
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 346 291 176 169 167 163 MB/s
|
62.8%
Good
|
|||
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 3TB-$60
93GB free
Firmware: CC4H
SusWrite @10s intervals: 124 125 125 130 128 127 MB/s
|
66.1%
Good
|
|||
44.4%
Average
|
||||
Generic STORAGE DEVICE 16GB
15GB free, PID 070e
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 12 11 11 12 12 MB/s
|
10.7%
Very poor
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3000 C16 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2800 MHz
|
52%
Above average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Ryzen 5 1600AMD $110Bench 70%, 392,253 samples | 979x |
Ryzen 7 1700AMD $195Bench 69%, 144,475 samples | 419x |
Ryzen 5 1600XAMD $120Bench 74%, 140,440 samples | 389x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 492x |
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples | 304x |
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 279x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 92% - Outstanding | Total price: $443 |