Medion MD34100/2547

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics5.97% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemMedion MD34100/2547  (all builds)
MotherboardMEDION B360H4-EM
Memory6.3 GB free of 12 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit kleuren
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20190617
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateNov 02 '21 at 18:39
Run Duration159 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-8400-$114
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
84.9% Excellent
Memory 82.3
1-Core 128
2-Core 252
85% 154 Pts
4-Core 486
8-Core 597
70% 541 Pts
64-Core 708
44% 708 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 84.9%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630 (Desktop Coffee Lake i5 i7)
Elitegroup(1019 A4A3) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.7642
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
5.97% Terrible
Lighting 6.4
Reflection 9.1
Parallax 7.6
5% 7.7 fps
MRender 9.7
Gravity 6.3
Splatting 10.7
7% 8.9 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.97%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel SSDSCKKF180G8L 180GB
14GB free (System drive)
Firmware: LHFL05P
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 465
Write 396
Mixed 398
94% 420 MB/s
4K Read 27.1
4K Write 71.4
4K Mixed 48.6
141% 49 MB/s
DQ Read 292
DQ Write 290
DQ Mixed 241
195% 274 MB/s
Poor: 70% Great: 101%
Intel Optane+932GBHDD 1TB
117GB free
Firmware: 17.8
SusWrite @10s intervals: 134 139 137 140 141 140 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 31% Great: 88%
Seagate Barracuda Green 2TB-$95
324GB free
Firmware: CC45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 73 77 76 77 78 77 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
44.5% Average
Read 78.6
Write 84.5
Mixed 56.2
SusWrite 76.4
54% 73.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.6
111% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 44.5%
Great: 75%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378A1K43CB2-CRC M378A5244CB0-CRC 12GB
2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
58.4% Above average
MC Read 25.3
MC Write 22.2
MC Mixed 18
62% 21.8 GB/s
SC Read 8.5
SC Write 14
SC Mixed 11
32% 11.2 GB/s
Latency 76.4
52% 76.4 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 58.4%
Great: 72%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MD34100/2547 Builds (Compare 8 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

System: Medion MD34100/2547

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 105% - Outstanding Total price: $114
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback