Asus M5A97 EVO R2.0

Performance Results


Gaming 37% Jet ski	Desktop 70% Battle cruiser	Workstation 29% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	55.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	76% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (42%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus M5A97 EVO R2.0 (all builds)
Memory	11.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20150212
Uptime	0.7 Days
Run Date	Nov 02 '21 at 16:53
Run Duration	245 Seconds
Run User	TUR-User
Background CPU	42%

Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (49^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD FX-8350-$130 313,196 User benchmarks, average bench 61% Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)	64.2% Good	Memory 82.4 1-Core 72.3 2-Core 136 59% 97.1 Pts	4-Core 253 8-Core 346 38% 299 Pts	64-Core 364 22% 364 Pts
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 64.2% Great: 68%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117 1,368,019 User benchmarks, average bench 56% Device(0000 0000) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 496.13 Performing below potential (59^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	55.8% Above average	Lighting 68.4 Reflection 74.9 Parallax 69.6 56% 71 fps	MRender 66.2 Gravity 71.3 Splatting 67.6 56% 68.4 fps
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 55.8% Great: 60%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 870 EVO 500GB-$64 60,851 User benchmarks, average bench 104% 97GB free (System drive) Firmware: SVT01B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 230 347 327 236 242 223 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	76% Very good	Read 306 Write 244 Mixed 255 SusWrite 268 60% 268 MB/s	4K Read 29.2 4K Write 54.1 4K Mixed 36.5 120% 39.9 MB/s	DQ Read 279 DQ Write 174 DQ Mixed 89.6 104% 181 MB/s
Poor: 73% ↑ This bench: 76% Great: 130%
Corsair Force LS 120GB-$98 9,315 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 30GB free Firmware: S8FM05.8 SusWrite @10s intervals: 167 192 193 197 200 120 MB/s Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)	49% Average	Read 325 Write 199 Mixed 174 SusWrite 178 49% 219 MB/s	4K Read 13.1 4K Write 41.3 4K Mixed 14 60% 22.8 MB/s	DQ Read 142 DQ Write 177 DQ Mixed 68.2 77% 129 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 49% Great: 84%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$37 815,515 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 1TB free Firmware: CC29 SusWrite @10s intervals: 153 173 174 174 174 174 MB/s Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)	96.7% Outstanding	Read 167 Write 137 Mixed 82.2 SusWrite 170 102% 139 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.9 155% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 96.7% Great: 114%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair CMZ8GX3M1A1600C10 F3-1600C9-8GXM 16GB 7 User benchmarks, average bench 38% 1333, 1333 MHz 8192, 8192 MB Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)	25.5% Poor	MC Read 8.4 MC Write 8.1 MC Mixed 7.3 23% 7.93 GB/s	SC Read 8 SC Write 7.5 SC Mixed 8 22% 7.83 GB/s	Latency 76.2 52% 76.2 ns
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 25.5% Great: 49%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical M5A97 EVO R2.0 Builds (Compare 581 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 38%

Jet ski

Desktop 69%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 31%

Sail boat

Motherboard: Asus M5A97 EVO R2.0 - $166

CPU
FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples	227x
FX-6300AMD $90Bench 55%, 261,607 samples	102x
FX-8320AMD $125Bench 59%, 106,454 samples	95x

GPU
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	41x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	30x
RX 570AMD $130Bench 45%, 473,685 samples	27x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	29x
860 Evo 250GBSamsung $45Bench 104%, 296,814 samples	21x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	18x

RAM
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 59%, 122,541 samples	22x
Savage DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBHyperXBench 51%, 78,181 samples	12x
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x4GBHyperX $35Bench 51%, 38,490 samples	12x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 70% - Very good

Total price: $512

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369