TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Acer Nitro AN515-57

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 47%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 46%
Yacht
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics46.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive340% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemAcer Nitro AN515-57  (all builds)
MotherboardTGL Scala_TLS
Memory10.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210919
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 02 '21 at 16:38
Run Duration154 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-11400H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
88.6% Excellent
Memory 69.5
1-Core 154
2-Core 302
92% 175 Pts
4-Core 576
8-Core 949
93% 763 Pts
64-Core 1,182
73% 1,182 Pts
Poor: 72% ↑
This bench: 88.6%
 Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650
Acer(1025 153A) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 30.0.14.7239
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
46.5% Average
Lighting 59.8
Reflection 54.5
Parallax 50.7
49% 55 fps
MRender 63.9
Gravity 49.9
Splatting 44
42% 52.6 fps
Poor: 27% ↑
This bench: 46.5%
 Great: 45%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme SAMSUNG MZVKW512HMJP-000L2 512GB
403GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 5L0QCXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1553 1643 1707 1712 1715 1666 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
340% Outstanding
Read 2,579
Write 1,515
Mixed 700
SusWrite 1,666
359% 1,615 MB/s
4K Read 55.8
4K Write 189
4K Mixed 79.7
286% 108 MB/s
DQ Read 1,264
DQ Write 842
DQ Mixed 1,025
772% 1,044 MB/s
Poor: 336% ↑
This bench: 340%
 Great: 340%
Seagate ST1000LM035-1RK172 1TB
633GB free
Firmware: LCM2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 96 102 102 102 101 105 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
45.1% Average
Read 55.6
Write 92.6
Mixed 60.4
SusWrite 101
57% 77.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.2
68% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑
This bench: 45.1%
 Great: 71%
SanDisk Cruzer Glide 16GB
15GB free, PID 5575
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.2 11 10 10 11 11 MB/s
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
11.9% Very poor
Read 35.8
Write 8.7
Mixed 6
SusWrite 10.3
16% 15.2 MB/s
4K Read 4.4
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 1.7
112% 2.4 MB/s
Poor: 7% ↑
This bench: 11.9%
 Great: 17%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston LV32D4S2S8HD-8 Samsung M471A1K43EB1-CWE 16GB
3200, 3200 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
73.5% Very good
MC Read 25.6
MC Write 30.7
MC Mixed 22.2
75% 26.2 GB/s
SC Read 16.8
SC Write 38.2
SC Mixed 17.9
69% 24.3 GB/s
Latency 103
39% 103 ns
Poor: 73% ↑
This bench: 73.5%
 Great: 107%
Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical Nitro AN515-57 Builds (Compare 15,193 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Nitro AN515-57

CPU
Core i5-11400HIntelBench 80%, 35,470 samples9,385x
Core i7-11800HIntelBench 88%, 56,029 samples5,227x
Core i9-11900HIntelBench 89%, 6,494 samples568x
GPU
UHD GraphicsIntelBench 4%, 25,082 samples5,211x
UHD GraphicsIntelBench 7%, 53,008 samples3,044x
RTX 3060 (Laptop)NvidiaBench 90%, 102,706 samples1,829x
SSD
WDC PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-512G-1114 512GBNvmeBench 186%, 8,325 samples4,159x
HFM512GD3JX016N 512GBNvmeBench 244%, 4,593 samples3,789x
KINGSTON OM8PDP3256B-AA1 256GBNvmeBench 158%, 2,168 samples1,213x
RAM
M471A1K43EB1-CWE 2x8GBSamsungBench 86%, 38,732 samples2,921x
M471A1K43EB1-CWE 1x8GBSamsungBench 40%, 14,450 samples2,208x
M471A2K43EB1-CWE 1x16GBSamsungBench 46%, 7,758 samples831x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback