Razer Blade 15 Studio Edition (Early 2020) - RZ09-033

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 101%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 93%
Nuclear submarine
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (82nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 18 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 96.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics100% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive239% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemRazer Blade 15 Studio Edition (Early 2020) - RZ09-033  (all builds)
MotherboardRazer CH551
Memory27.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.9 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210217
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 02 '21 at 12:00
Run Duration136 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 14%

 PC Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-10875H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
96.7% Outstanding
Memory 93.1
1-Core 140
2-Core 295
96% 176 Pts
4-Core 552
8-Core 713
81% 633 Pts
64-Core 1297
80% 1297 Pts
Poor: 52%
This bench: 96.7%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro RTX 5000 with Max-Q Design
Device(1A58 200A) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 30.0.14.9649
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
100% Outstanding
Lighting 121
Reflection 148
Parallax 134
99% 134 fps
MRender 150
Gravity 114
Splatting 118
103% 128 fps
Poor: 75%
This bench: 100%
Great: 102%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme CA5-8D1024 1TB
763GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CQA0904 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1796 1868 706 554 555 542 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
239% Outstanding
Read 1,582
Write 1,928
Mixed 1378
SusWrite 1,003
332% 1,473 MB/s
4K Read 52
4K Write 110
4K Mixed 69.7
227% 77.4 MB/s
DQ Read 1,155
DQ Write 813
DQ Mixed 926
708% 965 MB/s
Poor: 98%
This bench: 239%
Great: 249%
SanDisk Ultra USB 3.0 123GB
5GB free, PID 5595
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 72 28 20 20 20 18 MB/s
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
35.6% Below average
Read 147
Write 69.5
Mixed 73.4
SusWrite 29.6
94% 80 MB/s
4K Read 5.7
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 1.4
140% 3.07 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 35.6%
Great: 41%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A2K43DB1-CWE 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2933 MHz
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
94.8% Outstanding
MC Read 35.4
MC Write 37.2
MC Mixed 28.6
96% 33.7 GB/s
SC Read 19.3
SC Write 40.2
SC Mixed 28.6
84% 29.4 GB/s
Latency 62
65% 62 ns
Poor: 72%
This bench: 94.8%
Great: 105%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Blade 15 Studio Edition (Early 2020) - RZ09-033 Builds (Compare 137 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 76%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 71%
Battleship

System: Razer Blade 15 Studio Edition (Early 2020) - RZ09-033

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback