Razer Blade 15 Studio Edition (Early 2020) - RZ09-033

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (89th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 11 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 98.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics101% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemRazer Blade 15 Studio Edition (Early 2020) - RZ09-033  (all builds)
MotherboardRazer CH551
Memory24.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.9 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210217
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 02 '21 at 11:54
Run Duration139 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-10875H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 4.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
98.8% Outstanding
Memory 92.9
1-Core 151
2-Core 290
98% 178 Pts
4-Core 561
8-Core 1,007
94% 784 Pts
64-Core 1,346
83% 1,346 Pts
Poor: 52%
This bench: 98.8%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro RTX 5000 with Max-Q Design
Device(1A58 200A) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 30.0.14.9649
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
101% Outstanding
Lighting 124
Reflection 147
Parallax 132
101% 134 fps
MRender 150
Gravity 114
Splatting 117
103% 127 fps
Poor: 75%
This bench: 101%
Great: 102%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme CA5-8D1024 1TB
762GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CQA0904 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1542
Write 1,910
Mixed 1,374
360% 1,609 MB/s
4K Read 52.3
4K Write 115
4K Mixed 68.5
228% 78.5 MB/s
DQ Read 1,159
DQ Write 811
DQ Mixed 939
714% 970 MB/s
Poor: 98% Great: 249%
SanDisk Ultra USB 3.0 123GB
5GB free, PID 5595
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 152
Write 68.5
Mixed 66.2
106% 95.5 MB/s
4K Read 5.5
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.9
75% 2.37 MB/s
Poor: 10% Great: 41%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A2K43DB1-CWE 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2933 MHz
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
95.3% Outstanding
MC Read 35.3
MC Write 37.2
MC Mixed 28.8
96% 33.8 GB/s
SC Read 19
SC Write 41.7
SC Mixed 29.8
86% 30.2 GB/s
Latency 62.3
64% 62.3 ns
Poor: 72%
This bench: 95.3%
Great: 105%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Blade 15 Studio Edition (Early 2020) - RZ09-033 Builds (Compare 137 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 76%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 71%
Battleship

System: Razer Blade 15 Studio Edition (Early 2020) - RZ09-033

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback