Digiboard G41M-S

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 30%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (20th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 80 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 28.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics3.37% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive24.2% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemMSI CU-7592
MotherboardDigiboard G41M-S  (all builds)
Memory3.4 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110412
Uptime5 Days
Run DateNov 01 '21 at 21:45
Run Duration261 Seconds
Run User COL-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing below expectations (20th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium E6700-$199
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
28.3% Poor
Memory 43.5
1-Core 23.2
2-Core 64.2
27% 43.6 Pts
4-Core 75.8
8-Core 83.7
10% 79.8 Pts
64-Core 82.7
5% 82.7 Pts
Poor: 27%
This bench: 28.3%
Great: 46%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 710
Device(0000 0000) 2GB
CLim: 954 MHz, MLim: 400 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
3.37% Terrible
Lighting 4
Reflection 4.1
Parallax 3.6
3% 3.9 fps
MRender 3.8
Gravity 3.9
Splatting 5.1
4% 4.27 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.37%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 480GB-$38
361GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S3H01103
SusWrite @10s intervals: 122 101 117 121 122 132 MB/s
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
24.2% Poor
Read 166
Write 149
Mixed 94.2
SusWrite 119
30% 132 MB/s
4K Read 8.8
4K Write 8.4
4K Mixed 6.3
26% 7.83 MB/s
DQ Read 27.2
DQ Write 85.3
DQ Mixed 21
26% 44.5 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 24.2%
Great: 102%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 500GB-$25
456GB free
Firmware: CC38
SusWrite @10s intervals: 108 99 109 109 104 113 MB/s
Performing below expectations (40th percentile)
50.7% Above average
Read 69.8
Write 55.5
Mixed 48.7
SusWrite 107
52% 70.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 1
163% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 50.7%
Great: 70%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 6GB
null MHz
4096, 2048 MB
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
9.29% Terrible
MC Read 2.6
MC Write 3.1
MC Mixed 3
8% 2.9 GB/s
SC Read 2.7
SC Write 2.6
SC Mixed 1.9
7% 2.4 GB/s
Latency 187
21% 187 ns
Poor: 12%
This bench: 9.29%
Great: 46%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical G41M-S Builds (Compare 12 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 40%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Digiboard G41M-S

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 41% - Average Total price: $227
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate a lot of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback