Asus ROG STRIX X570-F GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 106%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 122%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 98.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics103% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive151% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
MotherboardAsus ROG STRIX X570-F GAMING  (all builds)
Memory55.5 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210809
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateNov 01 '21 at 20:25
Run Duration253 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (65th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 5900X-$260
AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.55 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
98.4% Outstanding
Memory 82.1
1-Core 166
2-Core 326
102% 191 Pts
4-Core 613
8-Core 1,193
107% 903 Pts
64-Core 2,330
144% 2,330 Pts
Poor: 87%
This bench: 98.4%
Great: 108%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-$266
Asus(1043 8816) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 3750 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 496.13
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
103% Outstanding
Lighting 136
Reflection 123
Parallax 128
111% 129 fps
MRender 146
Gravity 105
Splatting 90
90% 114 fps
Poor: 90%
This bench: 103%
Great: 106%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate FireCuda 510 SSD ZP250GM30001 250GB
74GB free (System drive)
Firmware: STPSC014
SusWrite @10s intervals: 344 311 313 302 298 304 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
151% Outstanding
Read 820
Write 762
Mixed 778
SusWrite 312
150% 668 MB/s
4K Read 44.9
4K Write 140
4K Mixed 44.5
199% 76.3 MB/s
DQ Read 841
DQ Write 945
DQ Mixed 345
412% 710 MB/s
Poor: 109%
This bench: 151%
Great: 215%
Seagate FireCuda 520 SSD ZP500GM30002 500GB
383GB free
Firmware: STNSC014
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2387 2412 2405 2404 2408 2409 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
398% Outstanding
Read 2,163
Write 1,486
Mixed 1,972
SusWrite 2404
452% 2,006 MB/s
4K Read 60.4
4K Write 230
4K Mixed 90
328% 127 MB/s
DQ Read 1,580
DQ Write 1,303
DQ Mixed 1,430
1,074% 1,437 MB/s
Poor: 124%
This bench: 398%
Great: 387%
Seagate IronWolf 3TB (2016)-$114
2.5TB free
Firmware: SC60
SusWrite @10s intervals: 170 172 176 177 176 177 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
101% Outstanding
Read 178
Write 161
Mixed 77.3
SusWrite 175
108% 148 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.8
155% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 101%
Great: 104%
Seagate IronWolf 2TB (2016)-$65
147GB free
Firmware: SC60
SusWrite @10s intervals: 106 105 106 108 107 103 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
56.3% Above average
Read 90.4
Write 92.7
Mixed 65
SusWrite 106
65% 88.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.6
119% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 56.3%
Great: 100%
QNAP TR-004 DISK01 3TB
371GB free, PID 0013
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 120 121 123 123 122 118 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
55.5% Above average
Read 150
Write 138
Mixed 28.1
SusWrite 121
140% 109 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.6
103% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 55.5%
Great: 55%
QNAP TR-004 DISK00 2TB
2TB free, PID 0013
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 120 121 123 123 122 118 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
54% Above average
Read 149
Write 153
Mixed 64.7
SusWrite 121
161% 122 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.7
91% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 54%
Great: 76%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3600 C18 4x16GB
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
117% Outstanding
MC Read 67.4
MC Write 32.7
MC Mixed 34.2
128% 44.8 GB/s
SC Read 26.6
SC Write 19.6
SC Mixed 31.8
74% 26 GB/s
Latency 76.7
52% 76.7 ns
Poor: 77%
This bench: 117%
Great: 134%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ROG STRIX X570-F GAMING Builds (Compare 4,610 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 184%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 201%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX X570-F GAMING

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 68% - Good Total price: $1,246
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback