Asrock X79 Champion

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 73%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 65%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 90.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics77.5% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive32.4% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock X79 Champion  (all builds)
Memory14.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1824 x 1026 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140303
Uptime0.9 Days
Run DateAug 23 '17 at 15:25
Run Duration125 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3960X
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 4.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
90.6% Outstanding
Memory 96.5
1-Core 115
2-Core 232
84% 148 Pts
4-Core 456
8-Core 744
73% 600 Pts
64-Core 890
55% 890 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 90.6%
Great: 88%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$278
CLim: 1987 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 385.28
Performing below potential (34th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
77.5% Very good
Lighting 94.8
Reflection 113
Parallax 89.4
77% 99.1 fps
MRender 96.9
Gravity 85.3
Splatting 101
78% 94.4 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 77.5%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V300 120GB-$36
36GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 60AABBF0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
32.4% Below average
Read 160
Write 79
Mixed 97.5
25% 112 MB/s
4K Read 16.8
4K Write 58
4K Mixed 8.7
67% 27.8 MB/s
DQ Read 18.8
DQ Write 66.3
DQ Mixed 8.8
16% 31.3 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 32.4%
Great: 73%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$37
739GB free
Firmware: CC26 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
87.2% Excellent
Read 167
Write 138
Mixed 148
114% 151 MB/s
4K Read 0.61
4K Write 1.14
4K Mixed 0.31
81% 0.69 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 87.2%
Great: 114%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR3 2400 C11 2x8GB
2 of 8 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
75% Very good
MC Read 31.1
MC Write 26.1
MC Mixed 24.8
78% 27.3 GB/s
SC Read 19.7
SC Write 15.3
SC Mixed 13.4
46% 16.1 GB/s
Latency 52.1
77% 52.1 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 75%
Great: 77%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X79 Champion Builds (Compare 30 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 114%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 99%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Asrock X79 Champion

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 83% - Excellent Total price: $636
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback