Asrock X79 Champion

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 89%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 78%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (73rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 27 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 90.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics96% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive45.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock X79 Champion  (all builds)
Memory14.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1824 x 1026 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140303
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 27 '17 at 14:51
Run Duration124 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3960X
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 4.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
90.7% Outstanding
Memory 96.5
1-Core 116
2-Core 231
85% 148 Pts
4-Core 457
8-Core 714
72% 585 Pts
64-Core 889
55% 889 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 90.7%
Great: 88%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$278
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 2252 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 382.53
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
96% Outstanding
Lighting 122
Reflection 123
Parallax 107
99% 117 fps
MRender 110
Gravity 110
Splatting 110
90% 110 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 96%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V300 120GB-$36
22GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 60AABBF0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
45.4% Average
Read 175
Write 90.7
Mixed 105
27% 124 MB/s
4K Read 23.7
4K Write 82.1
4K Mixed 14.5
98% 40.1 MB/s
DQ Read 111
DQ Write 91
DQ Mixed 9.23
32% 70.3 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 45.4%
Great: 73%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$37
781GB free
Firmware: CC26 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
86.2% Excellent
Read 155
Write 145
Mixed 143
111% 148 MB/s
4K Read 0.47
4K Write 1.17
4K Mixed 0.21
64% 0.62 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 86.2%
Great: 114%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR3 2400 C11 2x8GB
2 of 8 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
77% Very good
MC Read 31.7
MC Write 27.1
MC Mixed 25.5
80% 28.1 GB/s
SC Read 20.1
SC Write 15.6
SC Mixed 14.2
48% 16.6 GB/s
Latency 52.1
77% 52.1 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 77%
Great: 77%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X79 Champion Builds (Compare 30 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 114%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 99%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Asrock X79 Champion

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 83% - Excellent Total price: $636
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback