Asus P8Z77-V LX2

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics19.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus P8Z77-V LX2  (all builds)
Memory4.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120928
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateNov 01 '21 at 10:00
Run Duration314 Seconds
Run User ROU-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3330
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
71.9% Very good
Memory 90.4
1-Core 82.1
2-Core 171
68% 114 Pts
4-Core 311
8-Core 312
42% 312 Pts
64-Core 312
19% 312 Pts
Poor: 49%
This bench: 71.9%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 660-$170
Palit(1569 11C0) 2GB
CLim: 1228 MHz, MLim: 1527 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
19.9% Very poor
Lighting 22.2
Reflection 27.3
Parallax 31.3
18% 26.9 fps
MRender 33.9
Gravity 28.7
Splatting 25.3
24% 29.3 fps
Poor: 18%
This bench: 19.9%
Great: 21%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Apacer AS340 240GB
21GB free (System drive)
Firmware: H190117H
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 454
Write 440
Mixed 417
98% 437 MB/s
4K Read 28
4K Write 81.2
4K Mixed 38.8
135% 49.3 MB/s
DQ Read 327
DQ Write 302
DQ Mixed 302
230% 310 MB/s
Poor: 38% Great: 95%
WD Black 1TB (2010)-$49
41GB free
Firmware: 05.01D05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 60 65 65 58 65 65 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
40.3% Average
Read 76.8
Write 73.3
Mixed 60.3
SusWrite 63
51% 68.4 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.9
185% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 40.3%
Great: 76%
WDC WD40 EFRX-68WT0N0 4TB
277GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 51 55 54 47 55 56 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
34.4% Below average
Read 105
Write 102
Mixed 80.6
SusWrite 53
112% 85.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 0.9
116% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 34.4%
Great: 62%
WDC WD40 EFRX-68N32N0 4TB
42GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 21 18 19 19 19 19 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
24.2% Poor
Read 83.7
Write 84.5
Mixed 75.9
SusWrite 19
86% 65.8 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1
123% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 24.2%
Great: 68%
WDC WD40 03FZEX-00Z4SA0 4TB
172GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 30 28 27 27 28 28 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
33% Below average
Read 124
Write 126
Mixed 100
SusWrite 27.8
123% 94.7 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 1.2
141% 1.77 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 33%
Great: 59%
WDC WD30 03FZEX-00Z4SA0 3TB
80GB free, PID 0551
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 27 29 28 24 28 28 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
28.8% Poor
Read 101
Write 101
Mixed 54.2
SusWrite 27.1
90% 70.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1.2
133% 1.57 MB/s
ST6000VN 0033-2EE110 6TB
447GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 51 54 56 47 57 55 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
57.5% Above average
Read 200
Write 188
Mixed 111
SusWrite 53.3
175% 138 MB/s
4K Read 12.8
4K Write 4.5
4K Mixed 1.1
238% 6.13 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 57.5%
Great: 93%
WDC WD60 EFRX-68L0BN1 6TB
131GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 20 18 19 19 19 19 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
24.8% Poor
Read 89.9
Write 90.7
Mixed 77.8
SusWrite 18.9
90% 69.3 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1
119% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 24.8%
Great: 65%
WDC WD40 EFRX-68N32N0 4TB
757GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 20 18 19 18 19 19 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
28.7% Poor
Read 113
Write 114
Mixed 99.8
SusWrite 18.9
112% 86.4 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1
126% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 28.7%
Great: 68%
Kingston DataTraveler 100 G3 USB 3.0 8GB-$7
7GB free, PID 1666
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.2 5.4 4.8 4.8 4.8 5.4 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
20.9% Poor
Read 119
Write 3.5
Mixed 1.7
SusWrite 4.7
24% 32.3 MB/s
4K Read 10.7
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
40% 3.57 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 20.9%
Great: 22%
WDC WD40 EFRX-68N32N0 4TB
61GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 28 27 27 27 28 31 MB/s
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
25.7% Poor
Read 95.5
Write 95.1
Mixed 78.1
SusWrite 28.2
97% 74.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.9
95% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 25.7%
Great: 68%
WDC WD30 EFRX-68AX9N0 3TB
15GB free, PID 0551
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 24 29 28 24 27 31 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
20.5% Poor
Read 82.1
Write 81.8
Mixed 56.7
SusWrite 27.1
80% 61.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.6
51% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 20.5%
Great: 47%
WDC WD30 EFRX-68AX9N0 3TB
162GB free, PID 0551
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 24 29 28 24 28 31 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
25.2% Poor
Read 79
Write 80.5
Mixed 63.5
SusWrite 27
82% 62.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 0.9
119% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 25.2%
Great: 47%
WDC WD30 EFRX-68EUZN0 3TB
42GB free, PID 0551
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 24 29 28 24 28 30 MB/s
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
23.1% Poor
Read 73.5
Write 73.6
Mixed 58.9
SusWrite 26.9
76% 58.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.8
101% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 23.1%
Great: 58%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Transcend TX2400KLN-8GK 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
51.7% Above average
MC Read 18.5
MC Write 18.6
MC Mixed 16.3
51% 17.8 GB/s
SC Read 14.4
SC Write 14.9
SC Mixed 15.2
42% 14.8 GB/s
Latency 66.7
60% 66.7 ns
Poor: 35%
This bench: 51.7%
Great: 92%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8Z77-V LX2 Builds (Compare 1,214 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 41%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Asus P8Z77-V LX2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 89% - Excellent Total price: $280
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback