Asus H81M-P PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (74th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 26 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics23.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive69.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus H81M-P PLUS  (all builds)
Memory5.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160429
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 01 '21 at 09:02
Run Duration159 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (74th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4590-$188
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
79.8% Very good
Memory 88.6
1-Core 110
2-Core 215
79% 138 Pts
4-Core 411
8-Core 410
55% 410 Pts
64-Core 398
25% 398 Pts
Poor: 45%
This bench: 79.8%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 760-$209
Asus(1043 8472) 2GB
CLim: 1110 MHz, MLim: 1433 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 472.12
Performing below potential (19th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
23.5% Poor
Lighting 26.7
Reflection 29.4
Parallax 34.3
22% 30.1 fps
MRender 38
Gravity 34.6
Splatting 28.4
27% 33.7 fps
Poor: 24%
This bench: 23.5%
Great: 28%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial BX500 240GB-$28
178GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M6CR052
SusWrite @10s intervals: 316 408 354 328 303 293 MB/s
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
69.3% Good
Read 449
Write 390
Mixed 381
SusWrite 334
87% 388 MB/s
4K Read 29.8
4K Write 99.5
4K Mixed 1.1
99% 43.5 MB/s
DQ Read 136
DQ Write 59.2
DQ Mixed 25.8
38% 73.6 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 69.3%
Great: 92%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$28
931GB free
Firmware: MS2OA750
SusWrite @10s intervals: 160 172 167 173 177 176 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
97% Outstanding
Read 168
Write 159
Mixed 32.1
SusWrite 171
96% 132 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.6
135% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 97%
Great: 107%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5584-005.A00LF Samsung M378B5173EB0-YK0 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
59.1% Above average
MC Read 21.2
MC Write 22.3
MC Mixed 18.1
59% 20.5 GB/s
SC Read 15.5
SC Write 19.8
SC Mixed 18.1
51% 17.8 GB/s
Latency 68.9
58% 68.9 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 59.1%
Great: 56%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H81M-P PLUS Builds (Compare 370 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus H81M-P PLUS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 74% - Very good Total price: $281
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback