ZET WARD H125

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 84%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 78%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics95.3% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive73.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemZET WARD H125  (all builds)
MotherboardMicro-Star MAG B560M BAZOOKA (MS-7D18)
Memory11.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210705
Uptime1 Days
Run DateOct 31 '21 at 17:51
Run Duration260 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-10400F-$95
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
86.9% Excellent
Memory 92.6
1-Core 125
2-Core 252
88% 157 Pts
4-Core 437
8-Core 743
72% 590 Pts
64-Core 1,007
62% 1,007 Pts
Poor: 75%
This bench: 86.9%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-$256
Nvidia(10DE 2504) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3750 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 471.96
Performing below potential (17th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
95.3% Outstanding
Lighting 124
Reflection 112
Parallax 116
101% 117 fps
MRender 136
Gravity 99.7
Splatting 84.8
85% 107 fps
Poor: 90%
This bench: 95.3%
Great: 106%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Spcc Solid State Disk 512GB
375GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFM6B.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 223 91 80 81 81 82 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
73.2% Very good
Read 440
Write 217
Mixed 321
SusWrite 106
60% 271 MB/s
4K Read 33.8
4K Write 69.2
4K Mixed 27.8
123% 43.6 MB/s
DQ Read 244
DQ Write 297
DQ Mixed 184
163% 242 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 73.2%
Great: 102%
Seagate SkyHawk 1TB (2016)-$86
722GB free
Firmware: CV11
SusWrite @10s intervals: 164 167 167 167 167 166 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
92.8% Outstanding
Read 157
Write 152
Mixed 66.9
SusWrite 166
99% 136 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.9
162% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 92.8%
Great: 98%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (14th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
71.1% Very good
MC Read 28.6
MC Write 27.5
MC Mixed 21.1
74% 25.7 GB/s
SC Read 14.7
SC Write 21.5
SC Mixed 16.4
50% 17.5 GB/s
Latency 62.9
64% 62.9 ns
Poor: 65%
This bench: 71.1%
Great: 111%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical WARD H125 Builds (Compare 8 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 88%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 80%
Battleship

System: ZET WARD H125

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 98% - Outstanding Total price: $351
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback