HP Z800 Workstation

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 38%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 30%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics47.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive60.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory48GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 48GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemHP Z800 Workstation  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 0AECh
Memory45.6 GB free of 48.002 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180305
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 31 '21 at 17:43
Run Duration133 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon X5677
CPU0 PROCESSOR, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.45 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
73.5% Very good
Memory 83.9
1-Core 84.1
2-Core 178
67% 115 Pts
4-Core 367
8-Core 356
49% 361 Pts
64-Core 359
22% 359 Pts
Poor: 65%
This bench: 73.5%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 780-$329
Gigabyte(1458 3604) 3GB
CLim: 1293 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 472.12
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
47.2% Average
Lighting 56
Reflection 60.5
Parallax 70
46% 62.2 fps
MRender 68.3
Gravity 66.3
Splatting 53.2
50% 62.6 fps
Poor: 41%
This bench: 47.2%
Great: 49%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow UV400 240GB-$89
33GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0C3J96R9
SusWrite @10s intervals: 185 233 109 92 86 83 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
60.3% Good
Read 339
Write 348
Mixed 283
SusWrite 131
62% 275 MB/s
4K Read 17.9
4K Write 56.2
4K Mixed 26.4
91% 33.5 MB/s
DQ Read 241
DQ Write 231
DQ Mixed 160
141% 211 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 60.3%
Great: 88%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown ID:80 CE M393B1K70CH0-CH9 ID:80 2C 36JSF1G72PZ-1G4M1 ID:80 AD HMT31GR7CFR4C-H9 ID:80 2C 36JSF1G72PZ-1G4M1 ID:80 AD HMT31GR7CFR4C-H9 ID:80 CE M393B1K70CH0-CH9 82GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 34816 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
53.5% Above average
MC Read 20.2
MC Write 15.5
MC Mixed 22
55% 19.2 GB/s
SC Read 11.2
SC Write 13.2
SC Mixed 14.3
37% 12.9 GB/s
Latency 73.6
54% 73.6 ns
Poor: 52%
This bench: 53.5%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z800 Workstation Builds (Compare 1,950 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

System: HP Z800 Workstation

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback