Multilaser PC204

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 21%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 21.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics1.36% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (39%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemMultilaser PC204  (all builds)
MotherboardMultilaser PC204
Memory1.6 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20161221
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 31 '21 at 15:32
Run Duration152 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU 39%

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Celeron N3060
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.6 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
21.9% Poor
Memory 36.7
1-Core 22.1
2-Core 41.1
22% 33.3 Pts
4-Core 43.2
8-Core 43.1
6% 43.2 Pts
64-Core 45.2
3% 45.2 Pts
Poor: 6%
This bench: 21.9%
Great: 28%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics
Device(1297 2053) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4549
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
1.36% Terrible
Lighting 1.5
Reflection 1
Parallax 2.5
1% 1.67 fps
MRender 2
Gravity 1.7
Splatting 2.2
2% 1.97 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.36%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba MQ01ABF050M 500GB
416GB free (System drive)
Firmware: AM0P2A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 103 97 99 100 100 94 MB/s
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
51.8% Above average
Read 81.9
Write 94.8
Mixed 33
SusWrite 98.6
56% 77.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.6
113% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 51.8%
Great: 60%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown MS3512NSZ-HA3G1 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
16.1% Very poor
MC Read 5.2
MC Write 7.3
MC Mixed 5
17% 5.83 GB/s
SC Read 2.6
SC Write 4.5
SC Mixed 3
10% 3.37 GB/s
Latency 218
18% 218 ns
Poor: 8%
This bench: 16.1%
Great: 29%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PC204 Builds (Compare 2 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 21%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Multilaser PC204

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 9% - Terrible Total price: $56
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback