Multilaser PC204

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Tree trunk	Desktop 12% Tree trunk	Workstation 0% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (21st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 79 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 12.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics	0.56% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago.

System	Multilaser PC204 (all builds)
Motherboard	Multilaser PC204
Memory	1.1 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit cores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20161221
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Oct 31 '21 at 15:28
Run Duration	253 Seconds
Run User	BRA-User
Background CPU	100%

PC Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Celeron N3060 20,242 User benchmarks, average bench 18% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 1.6 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (20^th percentile)	12.3% Very poor	Memory 19.2 1-Core 9.8 2-Core 30.1 12% 19.7 Pts	4-Core 33.9 8-Core 22.2 4% 28.1 Pts	64-Core 31.4 2% 31.4 Pts
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 12.3% Great: 28%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics 60,712 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Device(1297 2053) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4549 Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	0.56% Terrible	Lighting 0.1 Reflection 0.9 Parallax 4.6 0% 1.87 fps	MRender 1.7 Gravity 1.7 Splatting 2 2% 1.8 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 0.56% Great: 2%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Toshiba MQ01ABF050M 500GB 1,812 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 416GB free (System drive) Firmware: AM0P2A SusWrite @10s intervals: 69 85 86 69 72 70 MB/s Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)	40.4% Average	Read 65.6 Write 80.5 Mixed 15.2 SusWrite 75.2 43% 59.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.1 4K Write 0.8 4K Mixed 0.2 41% 0.37 MB/s
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 40.4% Great: 60%
OCZ RALLY2 4GB 23 User benchmarks, average bench 5% 4GB free, PID 6387 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.3 5 4.5 4.8 4.7 4.3 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	3.07% Terrible	Read 12.5 Write 2 Mixed 4.2 SusWrite 4.6 6% 5.83 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 4% 0.37 MB/s
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 3.07% Great: 8%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown MS3512NSZ-HA3G1 1x4GB 109 User benchmarks, average bench 18% 1 of 2 slots used 4GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)	11.7% Very poor	MC Read 3.3 MC Write 5.7 MC Mixed 3.9 12% 4.3 GB/s	SC Read 1.8 SC Write 3 SC Mixed 2 6% 2.27 GB/s	Latency 327 12% 327 ns
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 11.7% Great: 29%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical PC204 Builds (Compare 2 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 21%

Surfboard

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

System: Multilaser PC204

CPU
Celeron N3060IntelBench 18%, 20,242 samples	2x

GPU
HD GraphicsIntelBench 1%, 60,712 samples	2x

SSD
Green 240GB (2018)WD $51Bench 45%, 156,194 samples	1x

RAM
MS3512NSZ-HA3G1 1x4GBUnknownBench 18%, 109 samples	1x
SF564128CJ8NWMNSEG 1x4GBUnknownBench 25%, 1,124 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 10% - Terrible

Total price: $51

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $250	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16