Hp-pavilion AW019AV-ABA e9250t

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 49%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics9.34% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive35.9% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHp-pavilion AW019AV-ABA e9250t  (all builds)
MotherboardMSI Indio
Memory6.5 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20091105
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 31 '21 at 12:29
Run Duration198 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7 860-$320
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
49% Average
Memory 68
1-Core 42
2-Core 93.6
43% 67.9 Pts
4-Core 168
8-Core 211
24% 190 Pts
64-Core 169
10% 169 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 49%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 550-Ti-$250
EVGA(3842 1556) 1GB
CLim: 951 MHz, MLim: 1089 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 388.13
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
9.34% Terrible
Lighting 10.6
Reflection 15.7
Parallax 4
9% 10.1 fps
MRender 16.6
Gravity 12.1
Splatting 11.4
11% 13.4 fps
Poor: 7%
This bench: 9.34%
Great: 9%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94
179GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 113 123 127 158 153 163 MB/s
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
35.9% Below average
Read 145
Write 48.3
Mixed 150
SusWrite 140
27% 121 MB/s
4K Read 13.7
4K Write 18.1
4K Mixed 12.9
47% 14.9 MB/s
DQ Read 171
DQ Write 153
DQ Mixed 122
102% 149 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 35.9%
Great: 134%
Hitachi HDS5C3020ALA632 2TB-$270
2TB free
Firmware: ML6OA580
SusWrite @10s intervals: 127 132 131 130 133 131 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
75.4% Very good
Read 132
Write 124
Mixed 62.2
SusWrite 131
82% 112 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.6
113% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 75.4%
Great: 73%
WD My Passport Essential 500GB
241GB free, PID 070a
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 25 26 25 26 26 26 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
13% Very poor
Read 29.4
Write 23.6
Mixed 20.7
SusWrite 25.6
33% 24.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.7
59% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 13%
Great: 18%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
CE80CE80 M378B5673EH1-CH9 M378B5673EH1-CH9 2C802C80 16KTF51264AZ-1G4M1 2C802C80 16KTF51264AZ-1G4M1 12GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 2048, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
25.7% Poor
MC Read 9.5
MC Write 8.9
MC Mixed 8.2
25% 8.87 GB/s
SC Read 4.9
SC Write 6.9
SC Mixed 6.6
18% 6.13 GB/s
Latency 106
38% 106 ns
Poor: 26%
This bench: 25.7%
Great: 37%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical AW019AV-ABA e9250t Builds (Compare 12 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Hp-pavilion AW019AV-ABA e9250t

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 89% - Excellent Total price: $72
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $80Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback