Asus K52JT

Performance Results


Gaming 5% Tree trunk	Desktop 51% Yacht	Workstation 5% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 54.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	1.18% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	52.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	10GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 10GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago.

System	Asus K52JT (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK K52JT
Memory	6.4 GB free of 10 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20110125
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Oct 30 '21 at 22:49
Run Duration	116 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	2%

PC Performing below expectations (31^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7 Q 740-$190 13,278 User benchmarks, average bench 54% Socket 989, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 1.75 GHz, turbo 1.8 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)	54.1% Above average	Memory 82.1 1-Core 58.2 2-Core 99.4 52% 79.9 Pts	4-Core 144 8-Core 208 22% 176 Pts	64-Core 212 13% 212 Pts
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 54.1% Great: 62%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6300M 2,918 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Asus(1043 1C92) 1GB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	1.18% Terrible	Lighting 1.4 Reflection 2.5 Parallax 1.9 1% 1.93 fps	MRender 2.1 Gravity 0.5 Splatting 1.9 1% 1.5 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.18% Great: 1%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 73GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 207 192 187 186 178 182 MB/s Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	52.7% Above average	Read 232 Write 222 Mixed 211 SusWrite 189 48% 213 MB/s	4K Read 19.6 4K Write 29.9 4K Mixed 23.1 75% 24.2 MB/s	DQ Read 193 DQ Write 188 DQ Mixed 186 141% 189 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 52.7% Great: 124%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown CMSO8GX3M1A1333C9 02FE EBJ21UE8BFU0-DJ-F 10GB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 28% 1333, 1333 MHz 8192, 2048 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	38.2% Below average	MC Read 15.2 MC Write 11.4 MC Mixed 12.5 37% 13 GB/s	SC Read 10.7 SC Write 9.6 SC Mixed 10.7 30% 10.3 GB/s	Latency 76.7 52% 76.7 ns
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 38.2% Great: 38%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical K52JT Builds (Compare 90 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 50%

Yacht

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

System: Asus K52JT

CPU
Core i7 Q 740Intel $190Bench 54%, 13,278 samples	23x
Core i5 M 480IntelBench 41%, 16,023 samples	21x
Core i3 M 370Intel $167Bench 39%, 23,407 samples	14x

GPU
Radeon HD 6300MAMDBench 1%, 2,918 samples	81x
Radeon HD 6370MAMDBench 1%, 535 samples	8x
Radeon HD 6300M Series (Engineering Sample - WDDM v1.20)AMDBench 1%, 20 samples	1x

SSD
SSD Plus 120GBSanDisk $42Bench 58%, 87,912 samples	3x
CS900 240GBPNY $20Bench 73%, 61,417 samples	3x
SSD 240GBBench 75%, 38,401 samples	3x

RAM
EBJ21UE8BFU0-DJ-F 2x2GBUnknownBench 27%, 753 samples	11x
SSZ3128M8-EDJEF 2x2GBAsintBench 27%, 888 samples	6x
M471B5273CH0-CH9 1x4GBSamsungBench 24%, 13,596 samples	5x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 50% - Above average

Total price: $232

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16