Asus TUF GAMING FX504GD_FX80GD

Performance Results


Gaming 14% Tree trunk	Desktop 78% Battleship	Workstation 13% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (74th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 26 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	6.11% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	60.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

Very high background CPU (45%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 99% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago.

System	Asus TUF GAMING FX504GD_FX80GD (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK FX504GD
Memory	11.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 11
BIOS Date	20210823
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Oct 30 '21 at 19:00
Run Duration	156 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	45%
CPU Throttled	99%

PC Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-8300H 167,898 User benchmarks, average bench 65% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	82.3% Excellent	Memory 92.6 1-Core 120 2-Core 215 82% 142 Pts	4-Core 389 8-Core 589 61% 489 Pts	64-Core 615 38% 615 Pts
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 82.3% Great: 80%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630 FAQ - How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs? Asus(1043 10C1) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 25.20.100.6446 Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	6.11% Terrible	Lighting 7.2 Reflection 31.3 Parallax 6.6 6% 15 fps	MRender 9.2 Gravity 4.9 Splatting 9.5 7% 7.87 fps
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 6.11% Great: 6%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Micron_1100_MTFDDAV256TBN 256GB 50,765 User benchmarks, average bench 72% 69GB free (System drive) Firmware: M0MA031 SusWrite @10s intervals: 114 127 138 128 142 145 MB/s Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)	60.1% Good	Read 422 Write 162 Mixed 177 SusWrite 132 49% 223 MB/s	4K Read 19.8 4K Write 67.4 4K Mixed 21.1 93% 36.1 MB/s	DQ Read 161 DQ Write 162 DQ Mixed 147 114% 157 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 60.1% Great: 91%
CT2000BX500SSD1 2TB 12,882 User benchmarks, average bench 74% 1.5TB free Firmware: M6CR030 SusWrite @10s intervals: 395 389 413 392 413 424 MB/s Performing above expectations (68^th percentile)	85.1% Excellent	Read 493 Write 414 Mixed 380 SusWrite 404 95% 423 MB/s	4K Read 27.2 4K Write 55.7 4K Mixed 22.4 99% 35.1 MB/s	DQ Read 184 DQ Write 306 DQ Mixed 40 88% 177 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 85.1% Great: 99%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown CT8G4SFS8266.C8FE Hynix HMA81GS6CJR8N-VK 16GB 68 User benchmarks, average bench 78% 2667, 2667 MHz 8192, 8192 MB Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	85.2% Excellent	MC Read 32.8 MC Write 33.9 MC Mixed 24.7 87% 30.5 GB/s	SC Read 13.1 SC Write 36.8 SC Mixed 24.5 71% 24.8 GB/s	Latency 62.8 64% 62.8 ns
Poor: 66% ↑ This bench: 85.2% Great: 85%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF GAMING FX504GD_FX80GD Builds (Compare 2,639 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 63%

Destroyer

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

System: Asus TUF GAMING FX504GD_FX80GD

CPU
Core i5-8300HIntelBench 65%, 167,898 samples	1,713x
Core i7-8750HIntelBench 70%, 442,631 samples	926x

GPU
UHD Graphics 630IntelBench 5%, 506,702 samples	1,576x
GTX 1050 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 23%, 160,694 samples	1,062x
RX 5700-XTAMD $250Bench 98%, 254,908 samples	1x

SSD
RBUSNS8154P3128GJ 128GBKingstonBench 81%, 18,233 samples	325x
RBUSNS8154P3256GJ 256GBKingstonBench 96%, 18,615 samples	122x
Micron_1100_MTFDDAV256TBN 256GBBench 72%, 50,765 samples	112x

RAM
HMA81GS6CJR8N-VK 1x8GBHynixBench 40%, 73,050 samples	883x
M471A1K43CB1-CTD 1x8GBSamsungBench 40%, 96,646 samples	221x
M471A2K43CB1-CTD 1x16GBSamsungBench 44%, 44,819 samples	81x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16