Acer Aspire F5-771G

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics5.68% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive69.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (45%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAcer Aspire F5-771G  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer SpiderMan_SK
Memory24.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170526
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateOct 30 '21 at 01:58
Run Duration288 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 45%

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7500U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
58.3% Above average
Memory 77.6
1-Core 106
2-Core 149
67% 111 Pts
4-Core 218
8-Core 275
32% 246 Pts
64-Core 162
10% 162 Pts
Poor: 22%
This bench: 58.3%
Great: 61%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake)
Acer(1025 111B) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64 Ver. 21.20.16.4534
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
5.68% Terrible
Lighting 6.4
Reflection 5.5
Parallax 6.1
5% 6 fps
MRender 7
Gravity 6
Splatting 10.2
7% 7.73 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.68%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HFS256G39TND-N210A 256GB
73GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 30001P10
SusWrite @10s intervals: 223 210 198 158 109 144 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
69.2% Good
Read 366
Write 219
Mixed 193
SusWrite 174
53% 238 MB/s
4K Read 28.5
4K Write 70.7
4K Mixed 23.6
111% 40.9 MB/s
DQ Read 324
DQ Write 164
DQ Mixed 105
115% 198 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 69.2%
Great: 83%
Seagate Expansion Desk 16TB
5TB free
Firmware: 0915
SusWrite @10s intervals: 206 194 202 201 201 204 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
28.3% Poor
Read 195
Write 196
Mixed 187
SusWrite 201
44% 195 MB/s
4K Read 15
4K Write 8.9
4K Mixed 1.3
29% 8.4 MB/s
DQ Read 5.6
DQ Write 8.3
DQ Mixed 1.5
3% 5.13 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 28.3%
Great: 38%
Seagate Momentus 2.5" 1TB
472GB free
Firmware: 2BA30001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 47 55 55 54 55 55 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
38.1% Below average
Read 79
Write 25.5
Mixed 51.3
SusWrite 53.5
39% 52.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
141% 1 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 38.1%
Great: 59%
Seagate Expansion Desk 8TB
421GB free
Firmware: 9401
SusWrite @10s intervals: 162 154 162 160 153 162 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
78.8% Very good
Read 115
Write 79.5
Mixed 22.3
SusWrite 159
68% 93.9 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 4.5
4K Mixed 0.7
203% 2.07 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 78.8%
Great: 94%
WD Elements 1TB
178GB free, PID 1078
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 21 22 21 21 22 22 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
15.1% Very poor
Read 37
Write 37
Mixed 27
SusWrite 21.6
40% 30.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.8
84% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 15.1%
Great: 43%
WD My Book 25DB 8TB
3.5TB free, PID 25db
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 22 20 21 21 21 21 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
16.6% Very poor
Read 36.7
Write 41
Mixed 31
SusWrite 21.1
44% 32.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 1
108% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 16.6%
Great: 62%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT16G4SFD824A.C16FHD 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
59.9% Above average
MC Read 18.8
MC Write 23.4
MC Mixed 21.6
61% 21.3 GB/s
SC Read 9.3
SC Write 25.9
SC Mixed 18.3
51% 17.8 GB/s
Latency 85.1
47% 85.1 ns
Poor: 58%
This bench: 59.9%
Great: 81%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aspire F5-771G Builds (Compare 111 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire F5-771G

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback