HP Compaq Elite 8300 CMT

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 20% Surfboard	Desktop 72% Battleship	Workstation 15% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	27.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	HP Compaq Elite 8300 CMT (all builds)
Motherboard	Hewlett-Packard 3396
Memory	7.9 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20120615
Uptime	8 Days
Run Date	Oct 29 '21 at 18:49
Run Duration	290 Seconds
Run User	BHR-User
Background CPU	5%

Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-2400-$250 166,255 User benchmarks, average bench 61% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	70.5% Very good	Memory 84.8 1-Core 86.5 2-Core 168 67% 113 Pts	4-Core 326 8-Core 327 44% 326 Pts	64-Core 322 20% 322 Pts
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 70.5% Great: 70%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% Zotac(19DA 1455) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 460.79 Performing below potential (35^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	27.8% Poor	Lighting 35 Reflection 38.2 Parallax 36.4 28% 36.5 fps	MRender 37.3 Gravity 36.6 Splatting 25.3 26% 33.1 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 27.8% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
WD Blue 160GB (2007)-$38 56,540 User benchmarks, average bench 40% 146GB free Firmware: 02.03A02 SusWrite @10s intervals: 57 58 59 57 56 58 MB/s Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	39.5% Below average	Read 79.7 Write 80.2 Mixed 53.5 SusWrite 57.5 50% 67.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 0.9 164% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 39.5% Great: 59%
Samsung HD321HJ 320GB 5,512 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 102GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1AC01118 SusWrite @10s intervals: 29 64 33 65 77 72 MB/s Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	34.6% Below average	Read 63.6 Write 85.9 Mixed 36.5 SusWrite 56.7 44% 60.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.3 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.8 131% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 34.6% Great: 64%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$32 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 447GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 158 158 164 165 165 163 MB/s Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)	73.2% Very good	Read 92.5 Write 82.4 Mixed 62.2 SusWrite 162 73% 99.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 2.4 4K Mixed 1 193% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 73.2% Great: 109%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$39 1,120,098 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 52GB free Firmware: CC43 SusWrite @10s intervals: 103 105 106 106 106 106 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	63.9% Good	Read 117 Write 75.3 Mixed 64.2 SusWrite 106 67% 90.5 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.6 136% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 63.9% Great: 113%
Seagate Desktop 802GB 16 User benchmarks, average bench 17% 1.5TB free, PID 3300 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 24 23 24 25 25 25 MB/s Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)	15.8% Very poor	Read 24.5 Write 19.4 Mixed 21.1 SusWrite 24.2 30% 22.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 0.9 108% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 15.8% Great: 22%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron 8JTF25664AZ-1G4D1 Hynix HMT125U6TFR8C-H9 866B Kingston 9905471-011.A00LF 12GB 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 2048, 2048, 4096, 4096 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	38.2% Below average	MC Read 13.4 MC Write 13.6 MC Mixed 11.7 37% 12.9 GB/s	SC Read 8.9 SC Write 12.6 SC Mixed 9.8 30% 10.4 GB/s	Latency 72.1 56% 72.1 ns

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Compaq Elite 8300 CMT Builds (Compare 2,766 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 62%

Destroyer

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

System: HP Compaq Elite 8300 CMT

CPU
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	1,044x
Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples	973x
Core i5-3570IntelBench 65%, 104,858 samples	402x

GPU
HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples	383x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	336x
HD 4000 (Desktop 1.15 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 52,547 samples	209x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	120x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	66x
MX500 500GBCrucial $53Bench 106%, 237,241 samples	42x

RAM
8JTF51264AZ-1G6E1 2x4GBMicronBench 52%, 17,707 samples	48x
HMT351U6CFR8C-PB 2x4GBHynixBench 53%, 17,809 samples	27x
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	27x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 64% - Good

Total price: $325

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $171	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $95	Nvidia RTX 4070 $542	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16