User System

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 27%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 25%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics33.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive25.7% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemX79
MotherboardIntel X79
Memory8.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201119
Uptime2 Days
Run DateOct 29 '21 at 17:03
Run Duration160 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2689 0
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
73.2% Very good
Memory 85.2
1-Core 87.4
2-Core 171
68% 115 Pts
4-Core 331
8-Core 517
52% 424 Pts
64-Core 844
52% 844 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 73.2%
Great: 77%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon RX 580
HP(103C 83C2) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1266 MHz, MLim: 1950 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 20.50.02.10
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
33.4% Below average
Lighting 40.8
Reflection 56.1
Parallax 49.9
33% 48.9 fps
MRender 47.6
Gravity 35
Splatting 41.2
34% 41.3 fps
Poor: 34%
This bench: 33.4%
Great: 46%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SSD HEORIADY HX-001F 512G 512GB
24GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 41 21 4 29 16 24 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
25.7% Poor
Read 371
Write 178
Mixed 41.3
SusWrite 22.5
33% 153 MB/s
4K Read 21.4
4K Write 3.4
4K Mixed 1
36% 8.6 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 25.7%
Great: 79%
Samsung Flash Drive FIT 128GB
53GB free, PID 1000
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 23 24 24 23 24 24 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
32.2% Below average
Read 33
Write 23.4
Mixed 23.5
SusWrite 23.9
34% 26 MB/s
4K Read 4.2
4K Write 6.9
4K Mixed 1.2
291% 4.1 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 32.2%
Great: 117%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT151R7TFR4C 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (33rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
45% Average
MC Read 16.7
MC Write 15.8
MC Mixed 14.9
45% 15.8 GB/s
SC Read 12.1
SC Write 11.4
SC Mixed 9.7
32% 11.1 GB/s
Latency 71.8
56% 71.8 ns
Poor: 39%
This bench: 45%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback