Asrock H81M-VG4 R2.0

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (85th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 15 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics3.5% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
MotherboardAsrock H81M-VG4 R2.0  (all builds)
Memory3.8 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140704
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 29 '21 at 15:06
Run Duration154 Seconds
Run User ROU-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing above expectations (85th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4460-$194
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.25 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
76.9% Very good
Memory 93
1-Core 99.3
2-Core 197
76% 130 Pts
4-Core 350
8-Core 367
48% 359 Pts
64-Core 356
22% 356 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 76.9%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R7 250
Asus(1043 0462) 1GB
CLim: 1050 MHz, MLim: 1150 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 20.10.35.02
Relative performance (0th percentile)
3.5% Terrible
Lighting 4.3
Reflection 5.2
Parallax 5.6
4% 5.03 fps
MRender 5.3
Gravity 4.2
Splatting 3.6
4% 4.37 fps
Poor: 7%
This bench: 3.5%
Great: 9%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$25
593GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CC45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 126 140 116 142 162 176 MB/s
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
95.7% Outstanding
Read 190
Write 178
Mixed 80.7
SusWrite 144
108% 148 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.8
153% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 95.7%
Great: 112%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CT51264BA160BJ.C8F 1315 CT25664BA160BJ.C4F 6GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 2048 MB
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
49% Average
MC Read 17.3
MC Write 17.4
MC Mixed 14.4
47% 16.4 GB/s
SC Read 13.8
SC Write 17.1
SC Mixed 14.9
44% 15.3 GB/s
Latency 62
64% 62 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 49%
Great: 49%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H81M-VG4 R2.0 Builds (Compare 1,321 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock H81M-VG4 R2.0

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 63% - Good Total price: $222
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback