MSI B450-A PRO MAX (MS-7B86)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 20%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics16.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive304% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemMicro-Star MS-7B86
MotherboardMSI B450-A PRO MAX (MS-7B86)  (all builds)
Memory10.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210928
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateOct 28 '21 at 08:43
Run Duration181 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3400G-$99
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
70.4% Very good
Memory 69
1-Core 122
2-Core 242
78% 144 Pts
4-Core 385
8-Core 656
63% 521 Pts
64-Core 661
41% 661 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 70.4%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon RX Vega 11 Graphics
AMD(1002 15D8) 2GB
Ram: 2GB, Driver: 21.6.1
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
16.5% Very poor
Lighting 21.9
Reflection 16.2
Parallax 30.7
18% 22.9 fps
MRender 9.6
Gravity 25.8
Splatting 15.7
14% 17 fps
Poor: 12%
This bench: 16.5%
Great: 18%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 980 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$90
795GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B4QFXO7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1979 2019 2009 2055 2053 2056 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
304% Outstanding
Read 1,674
Write 2,009
Mixed 1,807
SusWrite 2,029
426% 1,880 MB/s
4K Read 53.4
4K Write 122
4K Mixed 71.5
237% 82.1 MB/s
DQ Read 1,015
DQ Write 738
DQ Mixed 881
657% 878 MB/s
Poor: 149%
This bench: 304%
Great: 365%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 999GB
355GB free
Firmware: 0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 106 109 111 108 106 109 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
64% Good
Read 114
Write 90.8
Mixed 87.3
SusWrite 108
74% 100 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1
210% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 64%
Great: 110%
Seagate IronWolf 4TB (2016)-$90
2TB free
Firmware: SC60
SusWrite @10s intervals: 159 167 168 168 168 167 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
92.2% Outstanding
Read 155
Write 159
Mixed 71.8
SusWrite 166
101% 138 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.8
159% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 62%
This bench: 92.2%
Great: 108%
Samsung Spinpoint F2 1TB-$60
377GB free
Firmware: 1AG01118
SusWrite @10s intervals: 68 69 69 67 64 71 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
33.7% Below average
Read 49.2
Write 56.6
Mixed 37.3
SusWrite 68
39% 52.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.8
140% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 33.7%
Great: 58%
COWON iAUDIO 7 16GB
1GB free, PID 0750
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.8 5.6 4.8 4.6 4.9 5.4 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
2.93% Terrible
Read 5.5
Write 2.5
Mixed 4
SusWrite 5
6% 4.25 MB/s
4K Read 4.4
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
16% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 2.93%
Great: 3%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Aegis DDR4 3000 C16 2x8GB-$36
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (34th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
74.9% Very good
MC Read 28
MC Write 28.2
MC Mixed 24.8
77% 27 GB/s
SC Read 21.2
SC Write 27.1
SC Mixed 22.1
67% 23.5 GB/s
Latency 104
38% 104 ns
Poor: 62%
This bench: 74.9%
Great: 103%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical B450-A PRO MAX (MS-7B86) Builds (Compare 5,309 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 64%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 60%
Destroyer

Motherboard: MSI B450-A PRO MAX (MS-7B86)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 90% - Outstanding Total price: $397
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback