HP ProLiant DL160 G6

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
3 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemHP ProLiant DL160 G6  (all builds)
Motherboard
Memory21.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130701
Uptime2.9 Days
Run DateOct 26 '21 at 16:27
Run Duration123 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (69th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon X5650
Proc 1, 2 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 2.65 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
67.3% Good
Memory 79.5
1-Core 74.3
2-Core 147
60% 100 Pts
4-Core 297
8-Core 516
49% 407 Pts
64-Core 1,009
62% 1,009 Pts
Poor: 51%
This bench: 67.3%
Great: 71%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$25
397GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 20.01H20
SusWrite @10s intervals: 77 102 113 112 110 111 MB/s
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
62.3% Good
Read 113
Write 109
Mixed 66.9
SusWrite 104
72% 98.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.7
125% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 62.3%
Great: 69%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$25
338GB free
Firmware: 18.01H18
SusWrite @10s intervals: 108 113 109 111 109 110 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
59.9% Above average
Read 98.8
Write 103
Mixed 67.9
SusWrite 110
70% 94.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.9
164% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 59.9%
Great: 69%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung F7256R61F9333G 16x2GB
16 of 18 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz clocked @ 800 MHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
38.9% Below average
MC Read 15.2
MC Write 14
MC Mixed 12.8
40% 14 GB/s
SC Read 9.6
SC Write 5.5
SC Mixed 8
22% 7.7 GB/s
Latency 81.5
49% 81.5 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 38.9%
Great: 39%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ProLiant DL160 G6 Builds (Compare 8 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard

System: HP ProLiant DL160 G6

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 29% - Poor Total price: $268
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback