Toshiba Satellite L40D-A

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 32%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 33.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics2.38% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive27.6% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (83%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemToshiba Satellite L40D-A  (all builds)
MotherboardTOSHIBA VDKTE
Memory2.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130822
Uptime1 Days
Run DateOct 26 '21 at 02:26
Run Duration274 Seconds
Run User IDN-User
Background CPU 83%

 PC Performing below expectations (27th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A8-5545M APU
P0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.7 GHz, turbo 1.7 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
33.5% Below average
Memory 56.3
1-Core 17.4
2-Core 41.2
27% 38.3 Pts
4-Core 63.4
8-Core 68.8
9% 66.1 Pts
64-Core 59.8
4% 59.8 Pts
Poor: 24%
This bench: 33.5%
Great: 44%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 8510G
Toshiba(1179 FA00) 768MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.200.1062.1004
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
2.38% Terrible
Lighting 2.6
Reflection 4.1
Parallax 4.8
2% 3.83 fps
MRender 1.9
Gravity 4.4
Splatting 4
3% 3.43 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.38%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Midasforce 120GB 120GB
27GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S1127B0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 54 12 13 17 63 9.2 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
27.6% Poor
Read 340
Write 26.6
Mixed 22.1
SusWrite 28.1
22% 104 MB/s
4K Read 16.3
4K Write 3.4
4K Mixed 10.7
40% 10.1 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 27.6%
Great: 88%
WD Blue 2.5" 500GB (2013)
267GB free
Firmware: 03.01A03
SusWrite @10s intervals: 110 99 108 108 108 102 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
60.7% Good
Read 106
Write 102
Mixed 57.7
SusWrite 106
68% 92.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.7
132% 1 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 60.7%
Great: 63%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT41GS6AFR8A-PB 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
13.6% Very poor
MC Read 5.9
MC Write 2.5
MC Mixed 4.3
12% 4.23 GB/s
SC Read 4.3
SC Write 3
SC Mixed 4.6
11% 3.97 GB/s
Latency 139
29% 139 ns
Poor: 16%
This bench: 13.6%
Great: 32%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Satellite L40D-A Builds (Compare 5 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 37%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Toshiba Satellite L40D-A

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $85
Intel Core i5-13600K $235Nvidia RTX 4070 $499Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $342
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback