MSI MPG Z390 GAMING PLUS (MS-7B51)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics12% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive230% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemMicro-Star MS-7B51
MotherboardMSI MPG Z390 GAMING PLUS (MS-7B51)  (all builds)
Memory10.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20201231
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 25 '21 at 23:23
Run Duration209 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU9%

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-8400-$114
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
89.9% Excellent
Memory 96.7
1-Core 91.9
2-Core 247
81% 145 Pts
4-Core 448
8-Core 695
71% 572 Pts
64-Core 713
44% 713 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 89.9%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD HD 6850
Asus(1043 03B4) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
12% Very poor
Lighting 16.5
Reflection 18.6
Parallax 14.4
13% 16.5 fps
MRender 12.6
Gravity 11.7
Splatting 10.3
9% 11.5 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 12%
Great: 13%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC WDS100T2B0C 1TB
225GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 211210WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1493 812 822 831 833 797 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
230% Outstanding
Read 1,505
Write 1,568
Mixed 1,278
SusWrite 931
297% 1,321 MB/s
4K Read 46.5
4K Write 147
4K Mixed 63
229% 85.6 MB/s
DQ Read 1,248
DQ Write 679
DQ Mixed 1,145
803% 1,024 MB/s
Poor: 137%
This bench: 230%
Great: 269%
WD WD10EURX 1TB-$27
536GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 125 124 125 125 125 126 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
71.1% Very good
Read 123
Write 123
Mixed 78.6
SusWrite 125
82% 112 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 0.9
179% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 71.1%
Great: 87%
JMicron Generic DISK00 320GB
248GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 40 44 44 43 43 43 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
24.3% Poor
Read 59.6
Write 59.7
Mixed 41.2
SusWrite 42.9
68% 50.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.7
94% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 24.3%
Great: 44%
JMicron Generic DISK01 250GB
197GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 41 43 43 43 43 43 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
22.6% Poor
Read 59.1
Write 32.8
Mixed 40.8
SusWrite 42.8
57% 43.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.8
80% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 22.6%
Great: 52%
JMicron Generic DISK02 2TB
1.5TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.1 0.2 51 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
17.9% Very poor
Read 91
Write 191
Mixed 120
SusWrite 8.8
144% 103 MB/s
4K Read 4.2
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.1
39% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 17.9%
Great: 53%
JMicron Generic DISK04 2TB
1.5TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.2 0.2 1.5 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
18.1% Very poor
Read 104
Write 169
Mixed 158
SusWrite 0.6
149% 108 MB/s
4K Read 4.3
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.1
40% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 18.1%
Great: 38%
JMicron Generic DISK03 2TB
1.5TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.1 0.2 55 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
15.9% Very poor
Read 79.7
Write 96.8
Mixed 87.1
SusWrite 9.3
91% 68.2 MB/s
4K Read 2.1
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.1
32% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 15.9%
Great: 55%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown BL8G36C16U4RL.M8FE1 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
113% Outstanding
MC Read 44.1
MC Write 45.8
MC Mixed 33.2
117% 41 GB/s
SC Read 20
SC Write 42.9
SC Mixed 29.9
88% 30.9 GB/s
Latency 51.6
78% 51.6 ns
Poor: 74%
This bench: 113%
Great: 120%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MPG Z390 GAMING PLUS (MS-7B51) Builds (Compare 23,105 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 91%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 84%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: MSI MPG Z390 GAMING PLUS (MS-7B51) - $175

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 98% - Outstanding Total price: $837
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback