Zotac XXXXXX

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 28%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 29.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics1.68% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive28% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemZotac XXXXXX  (all builds)
MotherboardZOTAC XXXXXX
Memory4.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20151103
Uptime2.8 Days
Run DateJul 25 '17 at 03:40
Run Duration170 Seconds
Run User HKG-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Celeron N3150
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.6 GHz, turbo 2.1 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
29.1% Poor
Memory 47
1-Core 16.6
2-Core 35.7
24% 33.1 Pts
4-Core 67.1
8-Core 67.9
9% 67.5 Pts
64-Core 67.8
4% 67.8 Pts
Poor: 18%
This bench: 29.1%
Great: 32%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics
Zotac(19DA B301) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4531
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
1.68% Terrible
Lighting 1.5
Reflection 2.77
Parallax 2.59
1% 2.29 fps
MRender 3
Gravity 1.8
Splatting 4.22
3% 3.01 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.68%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Foresee 32GB SSD 31GB
2GB free (System drive)
Firmware: O0213E Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
28% Poor
Read 302
Write 76.1
Mixed 101
35% 160 MB/s
4K Read 13.5
4K Write 28.7
4K Mixed 2.29
38% 14.8 MB/s
DQ Read 15.6
DQ Write 15.3
DQ Mixed 2.27
5% 11 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 28%
Great: 35%
JMicron Generic DISK00 500GB
354GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
45.4% Average
Read 113
Write 108
Mixed 91.5
132% 104 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.74
4K Mixed 0.39
75% 0.91 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 45.4%
Great: 51%
JMicron Generic DISK01 250GB
232GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
51.9% Above average
Read 130
Write 135
Mixed 103
156% 123 MB/s
4K Read 0.63
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.59
60% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 51.9%
Great: 52%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 37635 38920 8GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
20.8% Poor
MC Read 7.7
MC Write 7.7
MC Mixed 8.1
22% 7.83 GB/s
SC Read 2.2
SC Write 3.8
SC Mixed 3.2
9% 3.07 GB/s
Latency 172
23% 172 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical XXXXXX Builds (Compare 42 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 28%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Zotac XXXXXX

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 8% - Terrible Total price: $139
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback