Biostar A880G+

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 45%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 45.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics5.62% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
MotherboardBiostar A880G+  (all builds)
Memory5.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.5 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20110125
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 25 '21 at 21:12
Run Duration110 Seconds
Run User IDN-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (70th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon II X2 250 (2013 D.Ri)
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3 GHz
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
45.7% Average
Memory 79.2
1-Core 44.2
2-Core 86.3
46% 69.9 Pts
4-Core 73.8
8-Core 78.5
10% 76.2 Pts
64-Core 85.8
5% 85.8 Pts
Poor: 27%
This bench: 45.7%
Great: 48%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 630
Asus(1043 8461) 2GB
CLim: 901 MHz, MLim: 450 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 391.35
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
5.62% Terrible
Lighting 7.1
Reflection 5.6
Parallax 8.3
6% 7 fps
MRender 4.6
Gravity 7.3
Splatting 7.1
5% 6.33 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.62%
Great: 5%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba MK3275GSX 320GB
61GB free (System drive)
Firmware: GT001M
SusWrite @10s intervals: 42 38 42 45 45 41 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
25.9% Poor
Read 47.8
Write 51.8
Mixed 39.3
SusWrite 42.1
34% 45.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.5
100% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 25.9%
Great: 46%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown T4G86U1-P9H T4G86U1-P9H 8GB
533, 533 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
27.1% Poor
MC Read 10.6
MC Write 6.6
MC Mixed 10
26% 9.07 GB/s
SC Read 6.1
SC Write 5.6
SC Mixed 7.4
18% 6.37 GB/s
Latency 82
49% 82 ns
Poor: 21%
This bench: 27.1%
Great: 28%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical A880G+ Builds (Compare 33 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 47%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Biostar A880G+

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $83
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback