Quixant QXc-71

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 20%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (75th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 25 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics16.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive103% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemQuixant QXc-71  (all builds)
MotherboardQuixant QXc-71
Memory12.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210827
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 25 '21 at 11:15
Run Duration145 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (75th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen Embedded V1807B Vega Gfx
FP5, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.35 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
68.2% Good
Memory 67.4
1-Core 113
2-Core 214
72% 132 Pts
4-Core 371
8-Core 620
60% 496 Pts
64-Core 611
38% 611 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 68.2%
Great: 77%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Vega 11 Graphics
AMD(1002 15DD) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 21.20.16
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
16.4% Very poor
Lighting 21.3
Reflection 15.7
Parallax 29
17% 22 fps
MRender 14.7
Gravity 24.2
Splatting 14.8
14% 17.9 fps
Poor: 9%
This bench: 16.4%
Great: 16%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC WDS100T2B0A-00SM50 1TB
653GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 415000WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 399 355 351 360 358 357 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
103% Outstanding
Read 490
Write 468
Mixed 376
SusWrite 363
95% 424 MB/s
4K Read 33.5
4K Write 80
4K Mixed 42.4
148% 52 MB/s
DQ Read 372
DQ Write 317
DQ Mixed 266
221% 318 MB/s
Poor: 65%
This bench: 103%
Great: 117%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 2TB
415GB free, PID b207
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 100 113 112 113 113 113 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
45.9% Average
Read 136
Write 134
Mixed 21.4
SusWrite 110
129% 100 MB/s
4K Read 1.5
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.5
43% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 45.9%
Great: 51%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown M4SE-8GM1NC0M-E 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
94.5% Outstanding
MC Read 35
MC Write 36.4
MC Mixed 30.8
97% 34.1 GB/s
SC Read 24.8
SC Write 40.8
SC Mixed 28.7
90% 31.4 GB/s
Latency 108
37% 108 ns
Poor: 95%
This bench: 94.5%
Great: 95%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical QXc-71 Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard

System: Quixant QXc-71

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549WD Black SN850X M.2 4TB $293
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback