HP Pavilion Sleekbook 15

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 29%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 32.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics2.72% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
6 years ago, 6 years ago.
SystemHP Pavilion Sleekbook 15  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 193B
Memory2.9 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130412
Uptime2.9 Days
Run DateAug 21 '17 at 19:32
Run Duration105 Seconds
Run User ZAF-User
Background CPU 15%

 PC Performing below expectations (34th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A8-4555M APU
Socket FT1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.6 GHz, turbo 1.6 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
32.9% Below average
Memory 51.9
1-Core 25.3
2-Core 46.9
28% 41.4 Pts
4-Core 83.1
8-Core 79.2
11% 81.1 Pts
64-Core 84.6
5% 84.6 Pts
Poor: 23%
This bench: 32.9%
Great: 41%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 7600G
HP(103C 193B) 512MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.200.1065.0
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
2.72% Terrible
Lighting 3.27
Reflection 3.77
Parallax 2.88
3% 3.3 fps
MRender 3
Gravity 2.53
Splatting 4.39
3% 3.31 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.72%
Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate ST750LM022 HN-M750MBB 750GB
61GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2AR20002 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
33.1% Below average
Read 55.7
Write 59.7
Mixed 61.4
44% 58.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.28
4K Write 0.99
4K Mixed 0.16
48% 0.48 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 33.1%
Great: 57%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5273CH0-YK0 Hynix HMT325S6EFR8A-PB 6GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 2048 MB
Performing below potential (9th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
15.2% Very poor
MC Read 6.7
MC Write 3.2
MC Mixed 5.2
14% 5.03 GB/s
SC Read 3.9
SC Write 3
SC Mixed 5.4
12% 4.1 GB/s
Latency 154
26% 154 ns
Poor: 15%
This bench: 15.2%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Pavilion Sleekbook 15 Builds (Compare 102 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 47%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: HP Pavilion Sleekbook 15

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback