Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Boot Drive	51% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

2 years ago, 2 years ago.

PC Performing as expected (55^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-4670K-$62 128,482 User benchmarks, average bench 68% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	80.5% Excellent	Memory 88.1 1-Core 108 2-Core 208 77% 135 Pts	4-Core 422 8-Core 420 56% 422 Pts	64-Core 413 26% 413 Pts
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 80.5% Great: 79%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Toshiba THNSNF12 128GB 34 User benchmarks, average bench 65% 63GB free (System drive) Firmware: N102 SusWrite @10s intervals: 268 295 268 263 200 297 MB/s Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	51% Above average	Read 341 Write 296 Mixed 300 SusWrite 265 68% 301 MB/s	4K Read 15.6 4K Write 25.1 4K Mixed 20.8 64% 20.5 MB/s	DQ Read 18.2 DQ Write 26.9 DQ Mixed 23.7 18% 22.9 MB/s
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 51% Great: 87%
WD Blue 250GB (2010)-$37 50,270 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 5GB free Firmware: 1H18 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 111 Write 109 Mixed 66 71% 95.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.6 115% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 21% Great: 70%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M378B5773EB0-CK0 Micron 4JTF25664AZ-1G6E1 M378B5173DB0-CK0 8GB 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz 2048, 2048, 4096 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	52.8% Above average	MC Read 18.2 MC Write 19.6 MC Mixed 17.2 52% 18.3 GB/s	SC Read 12.4 SC Write 17 SC Mixed 15.6 43% 15 GB/s	Latency 69.4 58% 69.4 ns

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 60%

Destroyer

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 230,189 samples	994x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	336x
GTX 1650Nvidia $155Bench 43%, 259,091 samples	227x

RAM
HMT451U6BFR8A-PB 2x4GBHynixBench 51%, 8,612 samples	53x
8JTF51264AZ-1G6E1 2x4GBMicronBench 52%, 17,707 samples	40x
M378B5173QH0-CK0 2x4GBSamsungBench 51%, 13,591 samples	26x

Value: 67% - Good

Total price: $142