TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X512JA_X512JA

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (90th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 10 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics5.92% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemAsus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X512JA_X512JA  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X512JA
Memory6.2 GB free of 12 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210611
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateOct 24 '21 at 17:45
Run Duration145 Seconds
Run User ZAF-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-1035G1
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 1.2 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
73.8% Very good
Memory 79.4
1-Core 124
2-Core 242
82% 148 Pts
4-Core 376
8-Core 486
55% 431 Pts
64-Core 482
30% 482 Pts
Poor: 28% ↑
This bench: 73.8%
 Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD G1
Asus(1043 1052) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.9565
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
5.92% Terrible
Lighting 6.6
Reflection 6.3
Parallax 6.5
5% 6.47 fps
MRender 9.1
Gravity 7.4
Splatting 8.9
7% 8.47 fps
Poor: 3% ↑
This bench: 5.92%
 Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-256G-1202 256GB
27GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 20200000
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 945
Write 1,089
Mixed 473
186% 836 MB/s
4K Read 40.5
4K Write 126
4K Mixed 63.3
209% 76.6 MB/s
DQ Read 797
DQ Write 511
DQ Mixed 643
482% 650 MB/s
Poor: 85% Great: 189%
Toshiba MQ01ABF050 500GB-$32
248GB free
Firmware: AM0P2D
SusWrite @10s intervals: 87 91 91 91 91 91 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
54.9% Above average
Read 101
Write 95.7
Mixed 32.7
SusWrite 90.4
58% 79.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.5
108% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 21% ↑
This bench: 54.9%
 Great: 60%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A5244CB0-CTD 859B CT8G4SFRA266.C8FE 12GB
2667, 2667 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
65.4% Good
MC Read 25.4
MC Write 24.6
MC Mixed 19.8
66% 23.3 GB/s
SC Read 15.8
SC Write 23.2
SC Mixed 19.6
56% 19.5 GB/s
Latency 81.7
49% 81.7 ns
Poor: 34% ↑
This bench: 65.4%
 Great: 65%
Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X512JA_X512JA Builds (Compare 184 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk

System: Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X512JA_X512JA

CPU
Core i5-1035G1IntelBench 51%, 53,170 samples100x
Core i3-1005G1IntelBench 44%, 22,960 samples47x
Core i7-1065G7IntelBench 53%, 58,314 samples37x
GPU
UHD G1IntelBench 5%, 68,603 samples147x
Iris Plus G7IntelBench 9%, 52,498 samples37x
SSD
WDC PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-256G-1002 256GBNvmeBench 117%, 2,488 samples21x
Optane+477G 512GBIntelBench 65%, 4,992 samples19x
HFM128GDJTNG-8310A 128GBBench 95%, 6,558 samples17x
RAM
HMAA1GS6CMR6N-VK Samsung M471A1K43DB1-CWE 16GBHynixBench 79%, 274 samples21x
M471A5244CB0-CTD 1x4GBSamsungBench 30%, 48,985 samples18x
4ATF51264HZ-2G6E1 Hynix HMA851S6DJR6N-XN 8GBMicronBench 69%, 342 samples16x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback