Asus M5A97 LE R2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics32.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive84.6% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus M5A97 LE R2.0  (all builds)
Memory20.2 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160324
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateOct 24 '21 at 11:29
Run Duration189 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-6300-$90
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 3 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
58.5% Above average
Memory 79.4
1-Core 69.6
2-Core 127
57% 91.9 Pts
4-Core 210
8-Core 271
31% 240 Pts
64-Core 276
17% 276 Pts
Poor: 44%
This bench: 58.5%
Great: 62%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960-$198
CLim: 1493 MHz, MLim: 1800 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 471.68
Performing below potential (65th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
32.5% Below average
Lighting 41.1
Reflection 44.4
Parallax 43.9
34% 43.1 fps
MRender 38
Gravity 39.8
Splatting 35.4
31% 37.7 fps
Poor: 30%
This bench: 32.5%
Great: 36%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
145GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 308 266 269 268 271 267 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
84.6% Excellent
Read 474
Write 286
Mixed 362
SusWrite 275
78% 349 MB/s
4K Read 35.6
4K Write 42.7
4K Mixed 39.4
127% 39.2 MB/s
DQ Read 274
DQ Write 134
DQ Mixed 185
142% 198 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 84.6%
Great: 124%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$23
465GB free
Firmware: 15.01H15
SusWrite @10s intervals: 113 118 117 118 119 118 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
68.3% Good
Read 121
Write 112
Mixed 70.7
SusWrite 117
77% 105 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.9
164% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 68.3%
Great: 69%
WD WD5000AZLX-00K4KA0 500GB
92GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 81 86 85 85 85 85 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
48.5% Average
Read 84.7
Write 77
Mixed 53.5
SusWrite 84.5
55% 74.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.9
149% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 48.5%
Great: 104%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$23
266GB free
Firmware: 17.01H17
SusWrite @10s intervals: 106 110 109 110 110 110 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
56.1% Above average
Read 86.3
Write 85.5
Mixed 62.2
SusWrite 109
63% 85.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.7
134% 1 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 56.1%
Great: 69%
ST500LM0 12 HN-M500MB 500GB
126GB free, PID 0408
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 62 78 74 78 79 79 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
29% Poor
Read 71.5
Write 48.9
Mixed 41.8
SusWrite 75.1
78% 59.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.6
46% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 29%
Great: 42%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMV8GX3M1A1333C9 Kingston KHX1866C10D3/8G CMV8GX3M1A1333C9 24GB
1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
45.8% Average
MC Read 19.5
MC Write 13.3
MC Mixed 16.9
47% 16.6 GB/s
SC Read 9.9
SC Write 8
SC Mixed 12.3
29% 10.1 GB/s
Latency 81.7
49% 81.7 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 45.8%
Great: 47%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M5A97 LE R2.0 Builds (Compare 1,463 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus M5A97 LE R2.0 - $200

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 81% - Excellent Total price: $377
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060 $289WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback