TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Dell PowerEdge R520

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 36.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
SystemDell PowerEdge R520
MotherboardDell PowerEdge R520  (all builds)
Memory57.8 GB free of 64 GB @ 1.6 GHz
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20131119
Uptime1.3 Days
Run DateAug 21 '17 at 14:44
Run Duration85 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2407 0
CPU1, 2 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
36.8% Below average
Memory 43.1
1-Core 33.8
2-Core 70.4
30% 49.1 Pts
4-Core 163
8-Core 419
33% 291 Pts
64-Core 450
28% 450 Pts
Poor: 33% ↑
This bench: 36.8%
 Great: 61%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Dell PERC H310 2TB
477GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.12
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
76.3% Very good
Read 160
Write 104
Mixed 121
96% 128 MB/s
4K Read 6.54
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 0.68
392% 3.21 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑
This bench: 76.3%
 Great: 74%
Dell PERC H310 21GB
16GB free
Firmware: 2.12
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
61.7% Good
Read 139
Write 75.4
Mixed 94.8
77% 103 MB/s
4K Read 1.37
4K Write 1.64
4K Mixed 0.53
146% 1.18 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑
This bench: 61.7%
 Great: 62%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown M393B2G70QH0-YK0 4x16GB
4 of 12 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 1066 MHz
Performing below potential (17th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
35.1% Below average
MC Read 14.8
MC Write 14.4
MC Mixed 12.8
40% 14 GB/s
SC Read 6.8
SC Write 2.3
SC Mixed 3.3
12% 4.13 GB/s
Latency 188
21% 188 ns
Poor: 20% ↑
This bench: 35.1%
 Great: 89%
Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback