Asus PRIME Z590M-PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 100%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 114%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 106%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 108%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics87.8% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive257% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
MotherboardAsus PRIME Z590M-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory58.5 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210712
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 23 '21 at 17:42
Run Duration261 Seconds
Run User GRC-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 2060 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-11700K-$234
LGA1200, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.85 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
108% Outstanding
Memory 94.4
1-Core 191
2-Core 381
118% 222 Pts
4-Core 650
8-Core 1,322
116% 986 Pts
64-Core 1,851
115% 1,851 Pts
Poor: 86%
This bench: 108%
Great: 110%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060-$288
Gigabyte(1458 402B) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 496.13
Performing below potential (35th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
87.8% Excellent
Lighting 109
Reflection 105
Parallax 107
89% 107 fps
MRender 131
Gravity 97.4
Splatting 90.9
85% 106 fps
Poor: 80%
This bench: 87.8%
Great: 97%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 980 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$90
523GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B4QFXO7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1420 982 295 151 234 197 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
257% Outstanding
Read 1,416
Write 2,039
Mixed 1,690
SusWrite 546
321% 1,423 MB/s
4K Read 66.9
4K Write 209
4K Mixed 98.1
338% 125 MB/s
DQ Read 1,595
DQ Write 1,212
DQ Mixed 1,342
1,020% 1,383 MB/s
Poor: 149%
This bench: 257%
Great: 365%
Intel Raid 0 Volume 256GB
74GB free
Firmware: 1.0.00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 107 77 93 78 87 79 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
73.9% Very good
Read 949
Write 276
Mixed 260
SusWrite 86.6
85% 393 MB/s
4K Read 27.4
4K Write 76
4K Mixed 12.3
98% 38.6 MB/s
DQ Read 117
DQ Write 6
DQ Mixed 7.3
19% 43.3 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 73.9%
Great: 237%
Intel Raid 0 Volume 4TB
3.5TB free
Firmware: 1.0.00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 273 277 276 276 274 279 MB/s
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
173% Outstanding
Read 325
Write 230
Mixed 105
SusWrite 276
170% 234 MB/s
4K Read 2.5
4K Write 4.4
4K Mixed 1.2
319% 2.7 MB/s
Poor: 82%
This bench: 173%
Great: 236%
Asustor iSCSI Storage 2.5TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 221
SusWrite @10s intervals: 27 27 27 27 28 28 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Kingston DataTraveler 160 32GB
4GB free, PID 1646
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 12 12 12 11 12 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
7.86% Terrible
Read 23
Write 9.7
Mixed 11.9
SusWrite 11.9
17% 14.1 MB/s
4K Read 8.2
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0.1
34% 2.77 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 7.86%
Great: 10%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX CMK64GX4M2E3200C16 2x31.5GB
2 of 4 slots used
63GB DIMM DDR4 2133 MHz clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
112% Outstanding
MC Read 41.9
MC Write 40.5
MC Mixed 37.3
114% 39.9 GB/s
SC Read 29.3
SC Write 45.2
SC Mixed 34.5
104% 36.3 GB/s
Latency 58.8
68% 58.8 ns
Poor: 55%
This bench: 112%
Great: 113%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PRIME Z590M-PLUS Builds (Compare 2,324 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 104%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 105%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 105%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus PRIME Z590M-PLUS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 108% - Outstanding Total price: $648
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback