MSI B450 TOMAHAWK MAX (MS-7C02)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 91%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 105%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 89%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 101%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics84.7% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive306% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C02
MotherboardMSI B450 TOMAHAWK MAX (MS-7C02)  (all builds)
Memory25.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210927
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 23 '21 at 17:38
Run Duration515 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU4%
Watch Gameplay: 5600-XT + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X-$190
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
101% Outstanding
Memory 89
1-Core 156
2-Core 304
99% 183 Pts
4-Core 605
8-Core 993
98% 799 Pts
64-Core 1,462
90% 1,462 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 101%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 5600-XT-$300
Ram: 6GB, Driver: 21.10.2
Performing below potential (73rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
84.7% Excellent
Lighting 108
Reflection 118
Parallax 160
88% 129 fps
MRender 94.8
Gravity 114
Splatting 81.4
78% 96.7 fps
Poor: 77%
This bench: 84.7%
Great: 87%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$63
275GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1146 887 893 890 890 855 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
306% Outstanding
Read 2,721
Write 2520
Mixed 1,904
SusWrite 927
451% 2,018 MB/s
4K Read 71.2
4K Write 177
4K Mixed 97.1
326% 115 MB/s
DQ Read 992
DQ Write 768
DQ Mixed 863
650% 874 MB/s
Poor: 178%
This bench: 306%
Great: 346%
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80
72GB free
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 8295
Write 7,570
Mixed 7,663
1,751% 7,843 MB/s
4K Read 433
4K Write 268
4K Mixed 345
1,240% 349 MB/s
DQ Read 1,406
DQ Write 801
DQ Mixed 971
758% 1,059 MB/s
Poor: 74% Great: 129%
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80
236GB free
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 461 312 315 315 308 185 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
117% Outstanding
Read 515
Write 494
Mixed 472
SusWrite 316
101% 449 MB/s
4K Read 42.9
4K Write 105
4K Mixed 58
195% 68.6 MB/s
DQ Read 388
DQ Write 362
DQ Mixed 371
280% 374 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 117%
Great: 129%
WD Blue 4TB (2015)-$85
503GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 95 95 97 97 97 98 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
61.6% Good
Read 117
Write 105
Mixed 73.3
SusWrite 96.7
72% 98 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.9
4K Mixed 1
202% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 61.6%
Great: 101%
WD Blue 4TB (2015)-$85
420GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 100 99 98 98 98 100 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
53.2% Above average
Read 86.2
Write 87.9
Mixed 65.4
SusWrite 98.5
62% 84.5 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1
201% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 53.2%
Great: 101%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2017)-$63
2TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 100 100 98 98 98 98 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
53.5% Above average
Read 87.9
Write 125
Mixed 60.2
SusWrite 98.6
68% 92.9 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0
59% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 53.5%
Great: 90%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2017)-$63
2TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 150 162 162 159 156 162 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
59.3% Above average
Read 48.3
Write 99.2
Mixed 75.8
SusWrite 159
70% 95.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0
47% 0.47 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 59.3%
Great: 90%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2017)-$63
1.5TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 95 98 98 98 98 98 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
49.9% Average
Read 76.5
Write 108
Mixed 60.3
SusWrite 97.4
63% 85.6 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0
63% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 49.9%
Great: 90%
WD Blue 2TB (2015)-$84
586GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 65 69 69 69 69 69 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
55.7% Above average
Read 125
Write 118
Mixed 84.8
SusWrite 68.4
73% 99.1 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.9
179% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 55.7%
Great: 84%
HP SSD S 700 500GB
379GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 123 130 127 131 132 131 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
291% Outstanding
Read 408
Write 361
Mixed 332
SusWrite 129
398% 307 MB/s
4K Read 21.9
4K Write 64.7
4K Mixed 19.2
2,935% 35.3 MB/s
DQ Read 23.4
DQ Write 81.2
DQ Mixed 20.3
3,539% 41.6 MB/s
Poor: 78%
This bench: 291%
Great: 302%
WDC WD10 EZEX-60WN4A0 1TB
392GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 116 129 125 125 129 125 MB/s
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
52.8% Above average
Read 117
Write 118
Mixed 103
SusWrite 125
158% 116 MB/s
4K Read 1.5
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1.2
138% 1.8 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 52.8%
Great: 64%
WDC WD60 EDAZ-11BMZB0 6TB
2TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0 16 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
64% Good
Read 187
Write 165
Mixed 126
SusWrite 2.7
149% 120 MB/s
4K Read 29.9
4K Write 9.5
4K Mixed 0.8
461% 13.4 MB/s
DQ Read 0.5
DQ Write 9.5
DQ Mixed 0.5
342% 3.5 MB/s
Poor: 25%
This bench: 64%
Great: 70%
WD easystore 2647 5TB
4TB free, PID 2647
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 112 111 110 110 111 109 MB/s
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
52.6% Above average
Read 121
Write 112
Mixed 91.4
SusWrite 110
146% 109 MB/s
4K Read 2.1
4K Write 3.4
4K Mixed 0.9
154% 2.13 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 52.6%
Great: 66%
ST1000LM 035-1RK172 970GB
901GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 122 130 127 131 132 130 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
54.6% Above average
Read 137
Write 115
Mixed 84.7
SusWrite 129
155% 116 MB/s
4K Read 2.1
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 1
110% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 54.6%
Great: 55%
WDC WD30 EZRZ-00GXCB0 3TB
1.5TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 129 129 125 125 128 128 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
59.7% Above average
Read 159
Write 165
Mixed 131
SusWrite 127
196% 146 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 1.1
136% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 59.7%
Great: 66%
WDC WD60 EDAZ-11BMZB0 6TB
3.5TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.1 0 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
55.9% Above average
Read 181
Write 180
Mixed 103
SusWrite 0
144% 116 MB/s
4K Read 4.3
4K Write 9.3
4K Mixed 0.7
356% 4.77 MB/s
DQ Read 0.4
DQ Write 9.6
DQ Mixed 0.6
348% 3.53 MB/s
Poor: 25%
This bench: 55.9%
Great: 70%
WD easystore 2625 5TB
2.5TB free, PID 2625
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 33 34 34 34 34 34 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
23.7% Poor
Read 38.6
Write 37.9
Mixed 29.1
SusWrite 34
47% 34.9 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 3.4
4K Mixed 0.9
150% 1.8 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 23.7%
Great: 65%
WDC WD20 SPZX-11UA7T0 2TB
1.5TB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.1 0 0.1 0 0 4.6 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
35% Below average
Read 141
Write 115
Mixed 85.5
SusWrite 0.8
104% 85.6 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 4.6
4K Mixed 0.3
171% 2 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 35%
Great: 32%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3600 C16 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing below potential (25th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
97.5% Outstanding
MC Read 39.6
MC Write 27.3
MC Mixed 39.4
101% 35.4 GB/s
SC Read 24.5
SC Write 23.9
SC Mixed 35.3
80% 27.9 GB/s
Latency 68.4
58% 68.4 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 97.5%
Great: 136%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical B450 TOMAHAWK MAX (MS-7C02) Builds (Compare 19,408 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 98%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 92%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: MSI B450 TOMAHAWK MAX (MS-7C02) - $90

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 112% - Outstanding Total price: $497
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback