Gigabyte GA-H170-HD3-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 81%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 70%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics110% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive101% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (27%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)
SystemGigabyte H170-HD3
MotherboardGigabyte GA-H170-HD3-CF  (all builds)
Memory24 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170307
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateOct 23 '21 at 16:15
Run Duration127 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 27%
Watch Gameplay: 2060S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (41st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700K-$170
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
71.6% Very good
Memory 77.5
1-Core 123
2-Core 223
79% 141 Pts
4-Core 354
8-Core 576
57% 465 Pts
64-Core 626
39% 626 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 71.6%
Great: 90%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060S (Super)-$510
Gigabyte(1458 401E) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2280 MHz, MLim: 3563 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 472.12
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
110% Outstanding
Lighting 136
Reflection 124
Parallax 142
111% 134 fps
MRender 192
Gravity 125
Splatting 117
115% 145 fps
Poor: 90%
This bench: 110%
Great: 106%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
CT1000MX500SSD4 1TB
286GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M3CR023
SusWrite @10s intervals: 356 394 417 430 327 326 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
101% Outstanding
Read 468
Write 430
Mixed 400
SusWrite 375
94% 418 MB/s
4K Read 30.5
4K Write 69.3
4K Mixed 43
138% 47.6 MB/s
DQ Read 382
DQ Write 326
DQ Mixed 305
242% 338 MB/s
Poor: 86%
This bench: 101%
Great: 123%
Seagate ST3500320NS 500GB-$100
316GB free
Firmware: SN04
SusWrite @10s intervals: 62 66 72 72 73 61 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
48.4% Average
Read 101
Write 89.6
Mixed 49.3
SusWrite 67.7
56% 76.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.6
124% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 48.4%
Great: 61%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown F4-2133C15-8GVR Kingston 9905599-020.A00G 04CD F4-2133C15-8GVR Kingston 9905599-020.A00G 32GB
2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
70.1% Very good
MC Read 24.5
MC Write 28
MC Mixed 22.5
71% 25 GB/s
SC Read 15
SC Write 28.4
SC Mixed 21.1
61% 21.5 GB/s
Latency 85.3
47% 85.3 ns
Poor: 69%
This bench: 70.1%
Great: 73%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-H170-HD3-CF Builds (Compare 702 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 40%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 35%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H170-HD3-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $515
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback