TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Gigabyte GA-H170-HD3-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 26%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 24%
Surfboard
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics25.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive95% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)
SystemGigabyte H170-HD3
MotherboardGigabyte GA-H170-HD3-CF  (all builds)
Memory27.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170307
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 08 '21 at 20:25
Run Duration127 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU3%
Watch Gameplay: 2060S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (36th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700K-$170
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
78.6% Very good
Memory 80.4
1-Core 130
2-Core 232
82% 147 Pts
4-Core 414
8-Core 634
65% 524 Pts
64-Core 672
42% 672 Pts
Poor: 70% ↑
This bench: 78.6%
 Great: 90%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060S (Super)-$510
Gigabyte(1458 401E) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2415 MHz, MLim: 3813 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 472.12
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
25.3% Poor
Lighting 3.8
Reflection 0.6
Parallax 150
3% 51.4 fps
MRender 0.5
Gravity 120
Splatting 112
68% 77.7 fps
Poor: 90% ↑
This bench: 25.3%
 Great: 106%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
CT1000MX500SSD4 1TB
321GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M3CR023
SusWrite @10s intervals: 362 364 403 202 49 45 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
95% Outstanding
Read 478
Write 428
Mixed 406
SusWrite 237
87% 387 MB/s
4K Read 31.7
4K Write 72.7
4K Mixed 44.8
144% 49.7 MB/s
DQ Read 389
DQ Write 343
DQ Mixed 305
245% 345 MB/s
Poor: 86% ↑
This bench: 95%
 Great: 123%
Seagate ST3500320NS 500GB-$100
324GB free
Firmware: SN04
SusWrite @10s intervals: 81 78 94 46 16 14 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
42.8% Average
Read 94.2
Write 12.4
Mixed 38.4
SusWrite 54.8
37% 50 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.6
127% 1 MB/s
Poor: 24% ↑
This bench: 42.8%
 Great: 61%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown F4-2133C15-8GVR Kingston 9905599-020.A00G 04CD F4-2133C15-8GVR Kingston 9905599-020.A00G 32GB
2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
71.8% Very good
MC Read 25.2
MC Write 28.1
MC Mixed 22.9
73% 25.4 GB/s
SC Read 15.6
SC Write 30.3
SC Mixed 22
65% 22.6 GB/s
Latency 79.8
50% 79.8 ns
Poor: 69% ↑
This bench: 71.8%
 Great: 73%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical GA-H170-HD3-CF Builds (Compare 703 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 40%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 35%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H170-HD3-CF

CPU
Core i7-6700Intel  $170Bench 72%, 282,363 samples208x
Core i5-6500Intel  $60Bench 64%, 241,476 samples161x
Core i7-6700KIntel  $170Bench 81%, 588,978 samples87x
GPU
GTX 970Nvidia  $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples73x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia  $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples69x
GTX 1070Nvidia  $278Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples51x
SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung  $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples34x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung  $85Bench 112%, 695,664 samples15x
750 EVO 250GBSamsung  $130Bench 94%, 75,831 samples15x
RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2133 C13 2x8GBCorsair  $45Bench 69%, 47,721 samples36x
HyperX 2133 C14 2x8GBKingstonBench 68%, 49,673 samples33x
Fury DDR4 2133 C14 2x4GBHyperX  $67Bench 69%, 46,617 samples20x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $515
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback